F. Hofbauer

630 total citations
9 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

F. Hofbauer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Hofbauer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 9 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 2 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in F. Hofbauer's work include Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (7 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (6 papers). F. Hofbauer is often cited by papers focused on Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (7 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (6 papers). F. Hofbauer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and Denmark. F. Hofbauer's co-authors include Jonathan J. Finley, G. Böhm, M. Kaniber, N. Hauke, Arne Laucht, J. M. Villas-Bôas, Peter Lodahl, Søren Stobbe, A. Kress and Ralf Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

F. Hofbauer

9 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Hofbauer Germany	7	424	281	129	92	46	9	449
A. Kress Germany	6	530 1.3×	325 1.2×	78 0.6×	77 0.8×	128 2.8×	8	553
N. Hauke Germany	9	662 1.6×	462 1.6×	237 1.8×	135 1.5×	53 1.2×	13	706
Emmanuel Dupuy France	10	413 1.0×	345 1.2×	90 0.7×	126 1.4×	87 1.9×	33	506
T. Suhr Denmark	6	318 0.8×	234 0.8×	87 0.7×	111 1.2×	12 0.3×	8	379
Jos van der Tol Netherlands	12	293 0.7×	613 2.2×	103 0.8×	58 0.6×	22 0.5×	32	642
Nipun Vats Canada	5	317 0.7×	229 0.8×	73 0.6×	96 1.0×	17 0.4×	5	335
Kazuhiro Igeta Japan	5	320 0.8×	199 0.7×	42 0.3×	91 1.0×	32 0.7×	9	364
Kirill A. Atlasov Switzerland	12	377 0.9×	298 1.1×	60 0.5×	104 1.1×	38 0.8×	18	409
S. Varoutsis France	8	363 0.9×	282 1.0×	109 0.8×	74 0.8×	70 1.5×	10	400
Yoshiya Sato Japan	5	302 0.7×	249 0.9×	73 0.6×	94 1.0×	20 0.4×	7	326

Countries citing papers authored by F. Hofbauer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Hofbauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Hofbauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Hofbauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Hofbauer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Hofbauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Hofbauer. The network helps show where F. Hofbauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Hofbauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Hofbauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Hofbauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Hofbauer. F. Hofbauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Laucht, Arne, J. M. Villas-Bôas, Søren Stobbe, et al.. (2010). Mutual coupling of two semiconductor quantum dots via an optical nanocavity. Physical Review B. 82(7). 78 indexed citations

2.

Laucht, Arne, N. Hauke, J. M. Villas-Bôas, et al.. (2009). Dephasing of Exciton Polaritons in Photoexcited InGaAs Quantum Dots in GaAs Nanocavities. Physical Review Letters. 103(8). 87405–87405. 90 indexed citations

3.

Laucht, Arne, F. Hofbauer, N. Hauke, et al.. (2009). Electrical control of spontaneous emission and strong coupling for a single quantum dot. New Journal of Physics. 11(2). 23034–23034. 111 indexed citations

4.

Hofbauer, F., et al.. (2007). Electrically probing photonic bandgap phenomena in contacted defect nanocavities. Applied Physics Letters. 91(20). 20 indexed citations

5.

Kress, A., F. Hofbauer, M. Kaniber, et al.. (2005). Manipulation of the spontaneous emission dynamics of quantum dots in two-dimensional photonic crystals. Physical Review B. 71(24). 105 indexed citations

6.

Kress, A., F. Hofbauer, M. Kaniber, et al.. (2005). Fabrication and investigation of photonic crystal microcavities for solid state quantum optics. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5733. 114–114. 5 indexed citations

7.

Kress, A., F. Hofbauer, Hubert J. Krenner, et al.. (2004). Investigation of cavity modes and direct observation of Purcell enhancement in 2D photonic crystal defect microcavities. Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 26(1-4). 351–355. 8 indexed citations

8.

Schuh, D., Emanuele Uccelli, Robert Schulz, et al.. (2004). Long-range ordered self-assembled InAs quantum dots epitaxially grown on (110) GaAs. Applied Physics Letters. 85(20). 4750–4752. 26 indexed citations

9.

Schuh, D., Emanuele Uccelli, Robert Schulz, et al.. (2004). Controlled positioning of self-assembled InAs quantum dots on (110) GaAs. Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 26(1-4). 72–76. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact