F. Gröschel

611 total citations
25 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

F. Gröschel is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Gröschel has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Materials Chemistry, 13 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 8 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in F. Gröschel's work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (16 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (10 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers). F. Gröschel is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Materials and Properties (16 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (10 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers). F. Gröschel collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and France. F. Gröschel's co-authors include H. Glasbrenner, Yong Dai, M. Victoria, Claude Bailat, Zhao Tong, Bin Long, Werner Wagner, K. Thomsen, Michael R. James and G.S. Bauer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Nuclear Engineering and Design.

In The Last Decade

F. Gröschel

25 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Gröschel Switzerland 11 350 189 102 74 67 25 426
Karl Ehrlich Germany 6 353 1.0× 86 0.5× 132 1.3× 50 0.7× 44 0.7× 7 402
S.J. Pawel United States 12 247 0.7× 100 0.5× 114 1.1× 70 0.9× 107 1.6× 31 332
S. N. Votinov Russia 11 392 1.1× 91 0.5× 183 1.8× 27 0.4× 44 0.7× 32 441
F. Tavassoli France 8 452 1.3× 108 0.6× 193 1.9× 27 0.4× 74 1.1× 11 508
Z. Voß Germany 12 491 1.4× 264 1.4× 184 1.8× 21 0.3× 34 0.5× 15 584
Yukio Miwa Japan 12 512 1.5× 77 0.4× 179 1.8× 28 0.4× 124 1.9× 46 569
F. Groeschel Switzerland 12 301 0.9× 197 1.0× 61 0.6× 120 1.6× 17 0.3× 28 388
P.J. Karditsas United Kingdom 9 299 0.9× 140 0.7× 109 1.1× 28 0.4× 18 0.3× 29 361
E.E. Bloom United States 10 582 1.7× 161 0.9× 340 3.3× 47 0.6× 76 1.1× 19 738
Laurent Forest France 11 415 1.2× 198 1.0× 160 1.6× 25 0.3× 29 0.4× 17 509

Countries citing papers authored by F. Gröschel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Gröschel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Gröschel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Gröschel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Gröschel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Gröschel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Gröschel. The network helps show where F. Gröschel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Gröschel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Gröschel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Gröschel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Gröschel. F. Gröschel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tian, Kuo, Frederik Arbeiter, S. Gordeev, F. Gröschel, & Yuefeng Qiu. (2017). The test cell configuration under IFMIF-DONES condition. Fusion Engineering and Design. 124. 1112–1117. 13 indexed citations
2.
Arbeiter, Frederik, et al.. (2016). The Test Cell configuration under IFMIF-DONES condition. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
3.
Gordeev, S., F. Gröschel, V. Heinzel, W. Hering, & Robert Stieglitz. (2015). Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Flow Behavior in Flow Conditioner of IFMIF Liquid-Lithium Target. Fusion Science & Technology. 68(3). 618–624. 2 indexed citations
4.
Gordeev, S., F. Gröschel, V. Heinzel, W. Hering, & Robert Stieglitz. (2014). Numerical study of the flow conditioner for the IFMIF liquid lithium target. Fusion Engineering and Design. 89(7-8). 1751–1757. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kondo, Keitaro, U. Fischer, F. Gröschel, et al.. (2014). The application of “Helios” supercomputer in radiation safety studies for the IFMIF. 84. 1401–1401. 2 indexed citations
6.
David, J.-C., Uwe Filges, F. Gröschel, et al.. (2009). Neutronic characterization of the MEGAPIE target. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 36(3). 350–354. 3 indexed citations
7.
Wagner, Werner, et al.. (2008). MEGAPIE at SINQ – The first liquid metal target driven by a megawatt class proton beam. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 377(1). 12–16. 34 indexed citations
8.
Mikityuk, Konstantin, Paul Coddington, & F. Gröschel. (2008). Analysis of radioactivity releases in the MEGAPIE reference accident. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 238(7). 1838–1844. 1 indexed citations
9.
Glasbrenner, H. & F. Gröschel. (2007). Liquid metal compatibility under irradiation: The LiSoR 5 experiment. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 367-370. 1590–1595. 6 indexed citations
10.
Dai, Yong, Claudio Fazio, D. Gorse, et al.. (2006). Summary on the preliminary assessment of the T91 window performance in the MEGAPIE conditions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 562(2). 698–701. 8 indexed citations
11.
Glasbrenner, H., et al.. (2006). Post-irradiation examination on LiSoR 3 experiment. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 356(1-3). 247–255. 6 indexed citations
12.
Dai, Yong, Xuxiang Jia, Dai Hamaguchi, et al.. (2005). The second SINQ target irradiation program, STIP-II. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 343(1-3). 33–44. 71 indexed citations
13.
Glasbrenner, H., Yong Dai, & F. Gröschel. (2005). LiSoR irradiation experiments and preliminary post-irradiation examinations. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 343(1-3). 267–274. 13 indexed citations
14.
Glasbrenner, H., et al.. (2005). Expansion of solidified lead bismuth eutectic. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 343(1-3). 341–348. 18 indexed citations
15.
Glasbrenner, H., J. Eikenberg, F. Gröschel, & L. Zanini. (2004). Polonium formation in Pb–55.5Bi under proton irradiation. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 335(2). 270–274. 4 indexed citations
16.
Glasbrenner, H. & F. Gröschel. (2004). Bending tests on T91 steel in Pb–Bi eutectic, Bi and Pb–Li eutectic. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 335(2). 239–243. 8 indexed citations
17.
Glasbrenner, H., F. Gröschel, & T. Kirchner. (2003). Tensile tests on MANET II steel in circulating Pb–Bi eutectic. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 318. 333–338. 12 indexed citations
18.
Kirchner, T., Anne Cadiou, Y. Foucher, et al.. (2003). LiSoR, a liquid metal loop for material investigation under irradiation. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 318. 70–83. 20 indexed citations
19.
Auger, T., L. Aphecetche, Anne Cadiou, et al.. (2002). MEGAPIE target design and LiSoR experiment — Status report. Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings). 12(8). 27–43. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bailat, Claude, A. Almazouzi, N. Baluc, et al.. (2000). The effects of irradiation and testing temperature on tensile behaviour of stainless steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 283-287. 446–450. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026