This map shows the geographic impact of F. Göebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Göebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Göebel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Göebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Göebel. The network helps show where F. Göebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Göebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Göebel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Göebel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Göebel. F. Göebel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Otte, A. N., I. Britvitch, A. Biland, et al.. (2009). Detection of Cherenkov light from air showers with Geigermode-APDs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 610(1). 415–418.4 indexed citations
6.
Göebel, F., Michael Backes, T. Bretz, et al.. (2008). Long term monitoring of bright TeV Blazars with the MAGIC telescope. RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen). 3. 1025–1028.1 indexed citations
7.
Hsu, C. C., M. Errando, F. Göebel, et al.. (2008). PMT Characterization for MAGIC II Telescope. ICRC. 3. 1507–1510.1 indexed citations
8.
Tescaro, D., H. Bartko, N. Galante, et al.. (2008). Study of the performance and capability of the new ultra-fast 2 GSamples/s FADC data acquisition system of the MAGIC telescope. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 3. 1393–1396.
9.
Mazin, D., et al.. (2008). Model analysis for the MAGIC telescope. RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen). 5. 1253–1256.
10.
Lucarelli, F., J. A. Barrio, P. Antoranz, et al.. (2008). The central pixel of the MAGIC telescope for optical observations. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 589(3). 415–424.10 indexed citations
11.
Backes, Michael, T. Bretz, F. Göebel, et al.. (2007). Long term monitoring of bright TeV Blazars with the MAGIC Telescope. 328(7). 677.
12.
Göebel, F., H. Bartko, E. Carmona, et al.. (2007). Upgrade of the MAGIC Telescope with a Multiplexed Fiber-Optic 2GSamples/s FADC Data Acquisition System system. ICRC. 3. 1481–1484.3 indexed citations
13.
Göebel, F.. (2007). Status of the second phase of the MAGIC telescope. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 3. 1485–1488.2 indexed citations
Mirzoyan, R., F. Göebel, C. C. Hsu, et al.. (2006). Enhanced quantum efficiency bialkali photo multiplier tubes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 572(1). 449–453.11 indexed citations
17.
Cortina, J., A. Armada, A. Biland, et al.. (2005). Technical Performance of the MAGIC Telescope. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5. 359.3 indexed citations
18.
Wagner, R. M., Marcos López, K. Mase, et al.. (2005). Observations of the Crab nebula with the MAGIC telescope. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2. 163.3 indexed citations
19.
Göebel, F.. (2000). Performance of the ZEUS forward plug calorimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 453(1-2). 230–232.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.