F. Douglas Witherspoon

628 total citations
48 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

F. Douglas Witherspoon is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Douglas Witherspoon has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 23 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 19 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in F. Douglas Witherspoon's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (25 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (25 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (23 papers). F. Douglas Witherspoon is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (25 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (25 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (23 papers). F. Douglas Witherspoon collaborates with scholars based in United States. F. Douglas Witherspoon's co-authors include Rodney Burton, A. Case, Sarah Messer, Jason Cassibry, Samuel Brockington, Scott Hsu, Shyke A. Goldstein, R. C. Elton, Michael Phillips and Miloš Stanić and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

F. Douglas Witherspoon

42 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Douglas Witherspoon United States 13 313 157 154 100 97 48 451
M. Dorf United States 13 365 1.2× 194 1.2× 156 1.0× 96 1.0× 37 0.4× 54 450
C. Thoma United States 15 349 1.1× 154 1.0× 210 1.4× 68 0.7× 109 1.1× 38 534
A. Case United States 9 317 1.0× 67 0.4× 91 0.6× 140 1.4× 56 0.6× 33 364
S. F. Garanin Russia 12 259 0.8× 80 0.5× 98 0.6× 42 0.4× 100 1.0× 71 346
W.L. Waldron United States 11 240 0.8× 229 1.5× 210 1.4× 36 0.4× 56 0.6× 73 471
R.E. Peterkin United States 10 186 0.6× 108 0.7× 145 0.9× 61 0.6× 51 0.5× 44 340
Michl Binderbauer United States 13 400 1.3× 114 0.7× 104 0.7× 133 1.3× 41 0.4× 45 471
P.-A. Gourdain United States 12 403 1.3× 73 0.5× 54 0.4× 183 1.8× 92 0.9× 61 466
T. J. Awe United States 14 513 1.6× 124 0.8× 118 0.8× 59 0.6× 200 2.1× 51 602
E. V. Grabovski Russia 14 361 1.2× 83 0.5× 71 0.5× 47 0.5× 160 1.6× 57 440

Countries citing papers authored by F. Douglas Witherspoon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Douglas Witherspoon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Douglas Witherspoon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Douglas Witherspoon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Douglas Witherspoon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Douglas Witherspoon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Douglas Witherspoon. The network helps show where F. Douglas Witherspoon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Douglas Witherspoon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Douglas Witherspoon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Douglas Witherspoon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Douglas Witherspoon. F. Douglas Witherspoon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chu, F., Alfred E. Brown, G. A. Wurden, et al.. (2024). Formation of a spherical plasma liner for plasma-jet-driven magneto-inertial fusion. Physics of Plasmas. 31(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Witherspoon, F. Douglas, et al.. (2019). Coaxial Plasma Gun Development for Plasma-Jet Driven Magneto-inertial Fusion (PJMIF). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 3 indexed citations
3.
Case, A. W., et al.. (2018). A New Pre-Ionization Technique for the HJ1 Coaxial Plasma Gun for PJMIF. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dunn, James P., et al.. (2017). Characterizing an octant of a spherically imploding plasma liner as an MIF driver. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hsu, Scott, Samuel Brockington, A. Case, et al.. (2017). Experiment to Form and Characterize a Section of a Spherically Imploding Plasma Liner. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 46(6). 1951–1961. 20 indexed citations
6.
Cassibry, Jason, et al.. (2014). Ram-pressure scaling and non-uniformity characterization of a spherically imploding liner formed by hypervelocity plasma jets. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014.
7.
Brockington, Samuel, et al.. (2012). The HyperV 8000 $\mu g$, 50 km/s Plasma Railgun for PLX. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 54. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hsu, Scott, T. J. Awe, Samuel Brockington, et al.. (2012). Spherically Imploding Plasma Liners as a Standoff Driver for Magnetoinertial Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 40(5). 1287–1298. 56 indexed citations
9.
Witherspoon, F. Douglas, Samuel Brockington, Sarah Messer, et al.. (2011). Development of MiniRailguns for the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 53. 1 indexed citations
10.
Case, A., et al.. (2011). High Speed Argon Plasma Jet Merging Studies In Support of PLX. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hsu, Scott, T. J. Awe, D.S. Hanna, et al.. (2011). Imploding plasma liners as a standoff driver for magneto-inertial fusion. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 77. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
12.
Cassibry, Jason, T. J. Awe, D.S. Hanna, et al.. (2010). Theory and Modeling of the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 52. 1 indexed citations
13.
Hsu, Scott, et al.. (2009). Overview of the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 51. 2 indexed citations
14.
Witherspoon, F. Douglas, A. Case, Sarah Messer, et al.. (2009). Plasma Guns for the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 51. 1 indexed citations
15.
Messer, Sarah, et al.. (2009). Fast pressure probe measurements of a high-velocity plasma plume. Physics of Plasmas. 16(6). 8 indexed citations
16.
Witherspoon, F. Douglas, et al.. (2007). Overview and Recent Results from the HyperV Plasma Gun. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 49. 1 indexed citations
17.
Case, A., et al.. (2006). Dense Hypervelocity Plasma Jets. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 48. 3 indexed citations
18.
Chinitz, W., et al.. (1992). High pressure hypervelocity electrothermal wind tunnel performance study and subscale tests. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2. 2 indexed citations
19.
Burton, Rodney, et al.. (1990). Heating of a Liquid/Vapor Mixture by a Pulsed Electric Discharge. 4 indexed citations
20.
Witherspoon, F. Douglas, Rodney Burton, & Shyke A. Goldstein. (1989). Railgun experiments with Lexan insulators. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 17(3). 353–359. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026