F. Conti

462 total citations
39 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

F. Conti is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Conti has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 13 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in F. Conti's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (28 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (12 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (12 papers). F. Conti is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (28 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (12 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (12 papers). F. Conti collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Switzerland. F. Conti's co-authors include Maurizio Conti, F. N. Beg, N. Aybar, H. U. Rahman, F. Giammanco, E. Ruskov, F. J. Wessel, A. Williams, Paolo Marsili and Eric N. Hahn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Optics Letters and Physics Letters A.

In The Last Decade

F. Conti

37 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Conti United States 10 173 142 98 53 38 39 330
Sam Barber United States 11 242 1.4× 212 1.5× 189 1.9× 75 1.4× 37 1.0× 31 368
W.L. Waldron United States 11 240 1.4× 210 1.5× 87 0.9× 56 1.1× 50 1.3× 73 471
P. W. Lake United States 10 179 1.0× 60 0.4× 145 1.5× 129 2.4× 39 1.0× 30 318
Franz-Josef Decker United States 7 416 2.4× 250 1.8× 187 1.9× 130 2.5× 42 1.1× 28 533
Timo Eichner Germany 9 243 1.4× 208 1.5× 204 2.1× 84 1.6× 12 0.3× 21 391
D.C. Moir United States 12 169 1.0× 135 1.0× 104 1.1× 30 0.6× 101 2.7× 49 348
P. J. Christenson United States 9 128 0.7× 171 1.2× 126 1.3× 33 0.6× 39 1.0× 13 310
G. Di Pirro Italy 11 164 0.9× 236 1.7× 158 1.6× 48 0.9× 13 0.3× 49 342
R.E. Peterkin United States 10 186 1.1× 145 1.0× 108 1.1× 51 1.0× 47 1.2× 44 340
P.A. Seidl United States 9 190 1.1× 83 0.6× 65 0.7× 23 0.4× 23 0.6× 39 281

Countries citing papers authored by F. Conti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Conti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Conti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Conti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Conti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Conti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Conti. The network helps show where F. Conti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Conti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Conti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Conti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Conti. F. Conti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goyon, C., C. M. Cooper, B. L. Goldblum, et al.. (2024). PANDA-FES: Portable and Adaptable Neutron Diagnostics for Advancing Fusion Energy Science. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 52(10). 4833–4841. 3 indexed citations
2.
Conti, F., A. Williams, H. U. Rahman, et al.. (2024). Neutron-producing gas puff Z-pinch experiments on a fast, low-impedance, 0.5 MA linear transformer driver. Journal of Applied Physics. 136(9). 2 indexed citations
3.
Gómez, M. R., Nichelle Bennett, Christopher Jennings, et al.. (2024). Understanding the impact of an applied axial magnetic field on efficient current coupling on the Z machine. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 27(10). 2 indexed citations
4.
Hansen, E. C., et al.. (2024). Code-to-code comparison between FLASH and HYDRA in gas-puff Z-pinch modeling. Physics of Plasmas. 31(12). 1 indexed citations
5.
Ruskov, E., et al.. (2023). Measurements of Neutrons Created in a Staged Z-Pinch With Krypton Liner and Deuterium Target at a 1-MA Pulsed Power Generator. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 51(11). 3310–3316. 1 indexed citations
6.
Aybar, N., et al.. (2023). Role of initial conditions in plasma-current coupling of gas-puff Z-pinches. Physics of Plasmas. 30(6). 1 indexed citations
7.
Aybar, N., F. Conti, M. Dozières, et al.. (2022). Dependence of Plasma-Current Coupling on Current Rise Time in Gas-Puff Z-Pinches. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 50(9). 2541–2547. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hahn, Eric N., et al.. (2021). Effect of insulator surface conditioning on the pinch dynamics and x-ray production of a Ne-filled dense plasma focus. Journal of Applied Physics. 129(22). 3 indexed citations
9.
Aybar, N., M. Dozières, D. B. Reisman, et al.. (2021). Azimuthal magnetic field distribution in gas-puff Z-pinch implosions with and without external magnetic stabilization. Physical review. E. 103(5). 53205–53205. 3 indexed citations
10.
Hahn, Eric N., et al.. (2021). Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a megaampere-class Kr-doped deuterium dense plasma focus. Physics of Plasmas. 28(2). 4 indexed citations
11.
Hansen, Stephanie B., et al.. (2021). Direct comparison of wire, foil, and hybrid X-pinches on a 200 kA, 150 ns current driver. Journal of Applied Physics. 129(7). 14 indexed citations
12.
Hahn, Eric N., et al.. (2020). Effect of krypton admixture in deuterium on neutron yield in a megaampere dense plasma focus. Journal of Applied Physics. 128(14). 10 indexed citations
13.
Aybar, N., F. Conti, F. N. Beg, et al.. (2020). Role of collisionality and radiative cooling in supersonic plasma jet collisions of different materials. Physical review. E. 101(2). 23205–23205. 4 indexed citations
14.
Conti, F., N. Aybar, H. U. Rahman, et al.. (2020). Study of stability in a liner-on-target gas puff Z-pinch as a function of pre-embedded axial magnetic field. Physics of Plasmas. 27(1). 16 indexed citations
15.
Rahman, H. U., et al.. (2019). A semi-analytic model of gas-puff liner-on-target magneto-inertial fusion. Physics of Plasmas. 26(3). 6 indexed citations
16.
Conti, F., N. Aybar, F. J. Wessel, et al.. (2018). Characterization of a Liner-on-Target Gas Injector for Staged Z-Pinch Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 46(11). 3855–3863. 12 indexed citations
17.
Sheftman, D., D. Gupta, T. Roche, et al.. (2016). Jet outflow and open field line measurements on the C-2U advanced beam-driven field-reversed configuration plasma experiment. Review of Scientific Instruments. 87(11). 10D120–10D120. 3 indexed citations
18.
Conti, F., et al.. (2016). Development And Characterization Of A Liner-On-Target Injector For Staged Z-Pinch Experiments. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.
19.
Ruskov, E., F. J. Wessel, H. U. Rahman, et al.. (2016). Comparison of Staged Z-pinch Experiments at the NTF Zebra Facility with Mach2 simulations. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016. 1 indexed citations
20.
Conti, F., et al.. (1974). Mass spectroscopy of the plasma of cw and TEA CO2-laser discharges. Physics Letters A. 48(3). 205–206. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026