Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The growth of crystals and the equilibrium structure of their surfaces
19514.2k citationsW. K. Burton, N. Cabrera et al.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciencesprofile →
I. Liquid crystals. On the theory of liquid crystals
19581.6k citationsF. C. FrankDiscussions of the Faraday Societyprofile →
Complex alloy structures regarded as sphere packings. I. Definitions and basic principles
This map shows the geographic impact of F. C. Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. C. Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. C. Frank more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. C. Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. C. Frank. The network helps show where F. C. Frank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. C. Frank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. C. Frank.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. C. Frank based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. C. Frank. F. C. Frank is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frank, F. C.. (1992). The conformal neo-eulerian orientation map. Philosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical properties. 65(5). 1141–1149.10 indexed citations
Frank, F. C.. (1983). Introductory remarks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 309(1507). 71–75.6 indexed citations
Frank, F. C., J.B. Mullin, & H. S. Peiser. (1968). Crystal growth 1968 : Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Crystal Growth Birmingham, U.K., 15-19 July 1968. North-Holland eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Frank, F. C., et al.. (1967). A study of strains in abraded diamond surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 301(1466). 239–252.27 indexed citations
Frank, F. C.. (1958). I. Liquid crystals. On the theory of liquid crystals. Discussions of the Faraday Society. 25. 19–19.1643 indexed citations breakdown →
Burton, W. K., N. Cabrera, & F. C. Frank. (1951). The growth of crystals and the equilibrium structure of their surfaces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 243(866). 299–358.4217 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Eshelby, J. D., F. C. Frank, & F. R. N. Nabarro. (1951). XLI. The equilibrium of linear arrays of dislocations.. The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 42(327). 351–364.718 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.