Everett Tate

410 citations
10 papers · 312 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
    • Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
    • Immune cells in cancer
    • Immune Response and Inflammation

Papers in

Everett Tate

10 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Everett Tate
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ophthalmology 45
  • Immunology 97
  • Cancer Research 31
  • Physiology 41
  • Immunology and Allergy 9
Replace Akio Abe with:
Akio Abe Japan
S. Majewski Poland
Peter J. Volberding United States
Jenna D. Lovaas United States
Nathalie Guriec France
Alicja Głuszko Poland
Yong Seok Choi South Korea
Diego Navarro Spain
S. Höxtermann Germany
Caixia Li China
Everett Tate relative to Akio Abe Japan Akio Abe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Akio Abe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Everett Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Everett Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Everett Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Everett Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Everett Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Everett Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Everett Tate. The network helps show where Everett Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Everett Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Everett Tate Line = papers co-authored together Everett Tate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201471
2 201357
3 201347
4 198143
5 201724
6 201518
7 201416
8 201913
9 201512
10 201511

About Everett Tate

Everett Tate is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (2 papers), Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (1 paper) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (45 citations), Immunology (97 citations), Cancer Research (31 citations), Physiology (41 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (9 citations). Everett Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Howard P. Cupples, Haris G. Vikis, Amy L. Rymaszewski, Heather Menden, Venkatesh Sampath, Neil Hogg, Ming You, Hao Zhang, Andrew E. Gelman and Kirkwood A. Pritchard. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Environmental Health Perspectives, Cancers, Endocrinology and American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact