Eva Ostermayer

1.6k total citations
17 papers, 155 citations indexed

About

Eva Ostermayer is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Ostermayer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 155 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Eva Ostermayer's work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers). Eva Ostermayer is often cited by papers focused on Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers). Eva Ostermayer collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Eva Ostermayer's co-authors include Renate Oberhoffer, K. T. M. Schneider, Bettina Kuschel, Javier U. Ortiz, Martina Rudelius, Peter Ewert, Alexander Kovacevic, Thorsten Fischer, Annette Wacker‐Gussmann and Matthias Gorenflo and has published in prestigious journals such as Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

Eva Ostermayer

15 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eva Ostermayer Germany 7 104 50 30 27 23 17 155
Michael Applebaum United States 5 119 1.1× 16 0.3× 32 1.1× 12 0.4× 26 1.1× 10 200
Ilaria Fantasia Italy 10 136 1.3× 39 0.8× 32 1.1× 32 1.2× 20 0.9× 34 202
Iris Krishna United States 5 97 0.9× 12 0.2× 22 0.7× 19 0.7× 4 0.2× 12 151
Natalia Prodan Germany 9 221 2.1× 28 0.6× 26 0.9× 12 0.4× 14 0.6× 24 276
Danielle Tate United States 7 143 1.4× 19 0.4× 19 0.6× 50 1.9× 8 0.3× 17 247
Tim Hurley Ireland 7 77 0.7× 22 0.4× 20 0.7× 45 1.7× 5 0.2× 18 182
Daniela de Oliveira Werneck Rodrigues Brazil 9 36 0.3× 16 0.3× 26 0.9× 17 0.6× 21 0.9× 37 227
Masaji Nagaishi Japan 6 134 1.3× 18 0.4× 42 1.4× 13 0.5× 36 1.6× 14 347
Mario Vega United States 10 154 1.5× 31 0.6× 38 1.3× 5 0.2× 23 1.0× 23 331
Ivonne Bedei Germany 5 60 0.6× 18 0.4× 25 0.8× 10 0.4× 16 0.7× 31 96

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Ostermayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Ostermayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Ostermayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Ostermayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Ostermayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Ostermayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Ostermayer. The network helps show where Eva Ostermayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Ostermayer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Ostermayer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Ostermayer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Ostermayer. Eva Ostermayer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
2.
Herrmann‐Lingen, Christoph, Eva Ostermayer, Alexander Kovacevic, et al.. (2023). Anxiety and Depression Levels in Parents after Counselling for Fetal Heart Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(1). 394–394. 6 indexed citations
3.
Kovacevic, Alexander, Annette Wacker‐Gussmann, Michael Elsässer, et al.. (2022). Parents’ Perspectives on Counseling for Fetal Heart Disease: What Matters Most?. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(1). 278–278. 14 indexed citations
4.
Kovacevic, Alexander, Michael Elsässer, Eva Ostermayer, et al.. (2021). Fetal Cardiac Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Does It Affect Parental Counseling?. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10(15). 3423–3423. 4 indexed citations
5.
Ortiz, Javier U., et al.. (2021). Prognostic Value of Cerebroplacental Ratio in Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses Before Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancies. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 44(1). 50–55. 7 indexed citations
6.
Ortiz, Javier U., O Graupner, Bernhard Haller, et al.. (2021). Does gestational age at term play a role in the association between cerebroplacental ratio and operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise?. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 100(10). 1910–1916. 5 indexed citations
7.
Kovacevic, Alexander, Michael Elsässer, Andreas Müller, et al.. (2020). Objective Assessment of Counselling for Fetal Heart Defects: An Interdisciplinary Multicenter Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(2). 467–467. 12 indexed citations
8.
Westphal, Dominik S., Gloria Leszinski, Esther Rieger‐Fackeldey, et al.. (2019). Lessons from exome sequencing in prenatally diagnosed heart defects: A basis for prenatal testing. Clinical Genetics. 95(5). 582–589. 22 indexed citations
9.
Graupner, O, Eva Ostermayer, Silvia M. Lobmaier, et al.. (2019). Application of the INTERGROWTH-21st chart compared to customized growth charts in fetuses with left heart obstruction: late trimester biometry, cerebroplacental hemodynamics and perinatal outcome. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 300(3). 601–613. 3 indexed citations
10.
Ostermayer, Eva, et al.. (2018). Cerebro-plazentare Ratio und das Risiko für operative Entbindung am Termin. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 1 indexed citations
11.
Wacker‐Gussmann, Annette, et al.. (2018). Prenatally Diagnosed Isolated Coronary Arterial Fistula Leading to Severe Complications at Birth. Case Reports in Cardiology. 2018. 1–3. 3 indexed citations
12.
Stümm, Markus, Michael Entezami, Karsten Haug, et al.. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of random massively parallel sequencing for non-invasive prenatal detection of common autosomal aneuploidies: a collaborative study in Europe. Prenatal Diagnosis. 34(2). 185–191. 32 indexed citations
13.
Baumgärtner, Anne K., Renate Oberhoffer, Volker R. Jacobs, et al.. (2009). Reversible Foetal Cerebral Ventriculomegaly and Cardiomyopathy under Chemotherapy for Maternal AML. Oncology Research and Treatment. 32(1-2). 40–43. 19 indexed citations
14.
Ortiz, Javier U., Eva Ostermayer, Thorsten Fischer, et al.. (2004). Severe fetal cytomegalovirus infection associated with cerebellar hemorrhage. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 23(4). 402–406. 25 indexed citations
15.
Gloning, K.-Ph., et al.. (1991). Schwere Wachstumsretardierung: Ergebnisse der Untersuchung fetaler Blutproben (Cordozentese). Gyn�kologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau. 31(2). 136–138.
16.
Ostermayer, Eva, et al.. (1989). Präpartale Punktion fetaler Ovarialzysten – eine Alternative zur Ovarektomie bei Neugeborenen?. Gyn�kologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau. 29(2). 265–267. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ostermayer, Eva, et al.. (1989). [Prepartal puncture of fetal ovarian cysts--an alternative to ovariectomy in newborn infants?].. PubMed. 29 Suppl 2. 265–7. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026