Eva Lærkner

868 total citations
20 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Eva Lærkner is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Lærkner has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 13 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eva Lærkner's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (13 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers). Eva Lærkner is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (13 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers). Eva Lærkner collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Eva Lærkner's co-authors include Ingrid Egerod, Helle Ploug Hansen, Regner Birkelund, Finn Olesen, Palle Toft, Pia Dreyer, Mette Juel Rothmann, Hanne Tanghus Olsen, Eva Jespersen and Anne Højager Nielsen and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

Eva Lærkner

19 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eva Lærkner Denmark 9 224 220 94 61 48 20 393
S. McKinley Australia 9 139 0.6× 200 0.9× 56 0.6× 84 1.4× 50 1.0× 26 493
Agness Tembo Australia 9 152 0.7× 182 0.8× 45 0.5× 34 0.6× 32 0.7× 23 346
Breanna Hetland United States 12 258 1.2× 172 0.8× 123 1.3× 125 2.0× 37 0.8× 37 395
Lance Patak United States 9 216 1.0× 138 0.6× 104 1.1× 62 1.0× 16 0.3× 17 441
Maria Henricson Sweden 12 153 0.7× 129 0.6× 103 1.1× 81 1.3× 57 1.2× 34 489
Kirsti Tøien Norway 10 310 1.4× 337 1.5× 201 2.1× 124 2.0× 17 0.4× 15 618
Ingrid Wåhlin Sweden 12 256 1.1× 140 0.6× 133 1.4× 143 2.3× 27 0.6× 26 454
Ingegerd Bergbom-Engberg Sweden 9 263 1.2× 276 1.3× 85 0.9× 75 1.2× 52 1.1× 9 456
Ingegerd Bergbom Engberg Sweden 10 138 0.6× 158 0.7× 69 0.7× 89 1.5× 45 0.9× 12 444
Beverley Ewens Australia 11 123 0.5× 95 0.4× 67 0.7× 58 1.0× 13 0.3× 44 323

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Lærkner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Lærkner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Lærkner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Lærkner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Lærkner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Lærkner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Lærkner. The network helps show where Eva Lærkner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Lærkner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Lærkner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Lærkner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Lærkner. Eva Lærkner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Collet, Marie Oxenbøll, Lars Bo Svendsen, Anne Højager Nielsen, Eva Lærkner, & Ingrid Egerod. (2025). Patient and family experiences of early cognitive rehabilitation in critical illness: A qualitative study protocol. Nursing in Critical Care. 30(2). e13254–e13254. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2023). Professional prehospital clinicians’ experiences of ethical challenges associated with the collaboration with organised voluntary first responders: a qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 31(1). 79–79. 1 indexed citations
5.
Collet, Marie Oxenbøll, et al.. (2023). Delirium and delirium severity screening in the intensive care—correspondence of screenings tools. Australian Critical Care. 37(3). 407–413. 3 indexed citations
6.
Nielsen, Anne Højager, et al.. (2023). Intensive care unit nurses' perception of three different methods for delirium screening: A survey (DELIS-3). Australian Critical Care. 36(6). 1035–1042. 4 indexed citations
7.
Collet, Marie Oxenbøll, Eva Lærkner, Ingrid Egerod, et al.. (2023). Functional and cognitive rehabilitation interventions during intensive care admission: A protocol for a systematic integrative review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 67(5). 670–674. 4 indexed citations
8.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2022). Writing a Diary for “You” — Intensive care nurses' narrative practices in diaries for patients: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 136. 104363–104363. 4 indexed citations
9.
Kjær, Maj‐Brit Nørregaard, Anders Granholm, Gitte Kingo Vesterlund, et al.. (2021). Development of a core outcome set for general intensive care unit patients—A protocol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 66(3). 415–424. 5 indexed citations
10.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2021). Parents’ experiences during and after their child’s stay in the paediatric intensive care unit – A qualitative interview study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 67. 103089–103089. 20 indexed citations
11.
Collet, Marie Oxenbøll, et al.. (2021). Does rocking motion calm delirious patients in ICU? A multicentre randomised clinical trial protocol (RockingICU). Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 65(7). 995–1001.
12.
Lærkner, Eva, Ingrid Egerod, Finn Olesen, Palle Toft, & Helle Ploug Hansen. (2019). Negotiated mobilisation: An ethnographic exploration of nurse–patient interactions in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 28(11-12). 2329–2339. 24 indexed citations
13.
Lærkner, Eva, Ingrid Egerod, Finn Olesen, & Helle Ploug Hansen. (2017). A sense of agency: An ethnographic exploration of being awake during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 75. 1–9. 41 indexed citations
15.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2016). Parents’ experience of a follow-up meeting after a child's death in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 38. 31–39. 7 indexed citations
16.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2016). Validation of the Danish version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 60(9). 1314–1322. 16 indexed citations
17.
Lærkner, Eva, Ingrid Egerod, & Helle Ploug Hansen. (2015). Nurses’ experiences of caring for critically ill, non-sedated, mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 31(4). 196–204. 84 indexed citations
18.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2015). No‐sedation during mechanical ventilation: impact on patient's consciousness, nursing workload and costs. Nursing in Critical Care. 21(1). 28–35. 18 indexed citations
19.
Lærkner, Eva, et al.. (2010). Noise in the Operating Room—What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 25(6). 380–386. 75 indexed citations
20.
Egerod, Ingrid, et al.. (2007). The extent and application of patient diaries in Danish ICUs in 2006. Nursing in Critical Care. 12(3). 159–167. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026