Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Blocks, Liquidity, and Corporate Control
1998519 citationsPatrick Bolton, Ernst‐Ludwig von Thaddenprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. The network helps show where Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Perotti, Enrico & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (2005). The Political Economy of Corporate Control and Labor Rents. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).19 indexed citations
11.
Thadden, Ernst‐Ludwig von & E.C. Perotti. (2003). Strategic Transparency and Informed Trading: Will Globalization Force Convergence of Corporate Governance?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 38.3 indexed citations
Perotti, Enrico & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (2001). Outside Finance, Dominant Investors and Strategic Transparency. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2733(2733).1 indexed citations
14.
Berglöf, Erik, Gérard Roland, & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (2000). An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Corporate Bankruptcy. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.22 indexed citations
15.
Thadden, Ernst‐Ludwig von. (1998). Intermediated Versus Direct Investment: Optimal Liquidity Provision and Dynamic Incentive Compatibility. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
16.
Bolton, Patrick & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (1997). Liquidity and Control: A Dynamic Theory of Corporate Ownership Structure. Tilburg University Research Portal. 154(1). 177–211.46 indexed citations
Berglöf, Erik & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (1994). Short-Term Versus Long-Term Interests: Capital Structure With Multiple Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal.29 indexed citations
19.
Berglöf, Erik & Ernst‐Ludwig von Thadden. (1994). Capital Structure with Multiple Investors. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.