Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Capture-Recapture Methods in Epidemiology: Methods and Limitations
1995586 citationsErnest B. Hook, Ronald R. Regalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ernest B. Hook
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest B. Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest B. Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest B. Hook more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest B. Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest B. Hook. The network helps show where Ernest B. Hook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernest B. Hook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernest B. Hook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernest B. Hook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ernest B. Hook. Ernest B. Hook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hassold, Terry, Ernest B. Hook, & Patricia A. Jacobs. (2016). Dorothy Warburton (1936–2016). The American Journal of Human Genetics. 99(4). 1000–1000.4 indexed citations
2.
Hook, Ernest B.. (2002). Prematurity in Scientific Discovery: On Resistance and Neglect. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).36 indexed citations
Hook, Ernest B.. (1992). Congenital malformations worldwide: A report from the international clearinghouse for birth defect monitoring systems. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 51(4). 919–920.2 indexed citations
7.
Hook, Ernest B.. (1991). Birth defects encyclopedia. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 49(2). 470–472.169 indexed citations
Hook, Ernest B.. (1989). Screening for Down syndrome: Reply to Wald et al. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 44(4). 587–590.1 indexed citations
10.
Hook, Ernest B.. (1987). The consequences of chromosome imbalance: Principles, mechanisms, and models. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 41(2). 316–318.1 indexed citations
Porter, Ian & Ernest B. Hook. (1980). Human embryonic and fetal death. Academic Press eBooks.246 indexed citations
13.
Risemberg, H M, et al.. (1979). Sister-chromatid exchange and phototherapy. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 60(3). 401–403.8 indexed citations
Hook, Ernest B. & Ian Porter. (1977). Population cytogenetics : studies in humans : proceedings of a Symposium on Human Population Cytogenetics sponsored by the Birth Defects Institute of the New York State Department of Health, held in Albany, New York, October 14-15, 1975. Academic Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
16.
Hook, Ernest B.. (1977). Cytogenetics, environment, and malformation syndromes. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 29(3). 322–322.38 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.