Erika Lerch

38 total papers · 773 total citations
19 papers, 508 citations indexed

About

Erika Lerch is a scholar working on Oncology, Hematology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Erika Lerch has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 508 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Hematology and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Erika Lerch's work include Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (4 papers). Erika Lerch is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (4 papers). Erika Lerch collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and France. Erika Lerch's co-authors include Ulrich R. Müller, Christoph Henzen, Verena Briner, Emanuele Zucca, Michele Ghielmini, Cristiana Sessa, Andrea Bordoni, Laura Negretti, F. Cavalli and Marco Siano and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Blood and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Erika Lerch

19 papers receiving 486 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Erika Lerch	146	129	71	65	63	19	508
S. Deam	79 0.5×	80 0.6×	60 0.8×	23 0.4×	38 0.6×	14	477
Akira Hoshioka	221 1.5×	90 0.7×	96 1.4×	40 0.6×	16 0.3×	28	573
R. Dreher	74 0.5×	27 0.2×	61 0.9×	42 0.6×	46 0.7×	29	613
D J Evans	149 1.0×	16 0.1×	64 0.9×	30 0.5×	72 1.1×	17	482
Blaise Robin	127 0.9×	101 0.8×	70 1.0×	35 0.5×	48 0.8×	25	564
Iwona Kucharewicz	103 0.7×	72 0.6×	105 1.5×	11 0.2×	11 0.2×	22	500
F. Paolieri	68 0.5×	155 1.2×	68 1.0×	13 0.2×	39 0.6×	17	458
Kiyoshi Takahashi	35 0.2×	45 0.3×	26 0.4×	31 0.5×	81 1.3×	15	567
Benjamin Schrijver	63 0.4×	23 0.2×	24 0.3×	89 1.4×	41 0.7×	29	539
Isabelle Pâris	145 1.0×	16 0.1×	20 0.3×	23 0.4×	75 1.2×	17	569

Countries citing papers authored by Erika Lerch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Lerch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Lerch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Lerch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Lerch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Lerch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Lerch. The network helps show where Erika Lerch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika Lerch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika Lerch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika Lerch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erika Lerch. Erika Lerch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact