Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Observation of a Localized Flat-Band State in a Photonic Lieb Lattice
2015481 citationsSebabrata Mukherjee, Debaditya Choudhury et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities
2011465 citationsAdetunmise C. Dada, Jonathan Leach et al.Nature Physicsprofile →
Photons Walking the Line: A Quantum Walk with Adjustable Coin Operations
2010405 citationsAndreas Schreiber, K. N. Cassemiro et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Erika Andersson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Andersson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Andersson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Andersson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Andersson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Andersson. The network helps show where Erika Andersson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika Andersson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika Andersson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika Andersson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erika Andersson. Erika Andersson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mukherjee, Sebabrata, Debaditya Choudhury, Nathan Goldman, et al.. (2015). Observation of a Localized Flat-Band State in a Photonic Lieb Lattice. Physical Review Letters. 114(24). 245504–245504.481 indexed citations breakdown →
Collins, Robert J., Ross Donaldson, Vedran Dunjko, et al.. (2013). Optical realisation of Quantum Digital Signatures without quantum memory. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Dada, Adetunmise C., Jonathan Leach, Gerald S. Buller, Miles J. Padgett, & Erika Andersson. (2011). Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nature Physics. 7(9). 677–680.465 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Schreiber, Andreas, K. N. Cassemiro, Václav Potoček, et al.. (2010). Photons Walking the Line: A Quantum Walk with Adjustable Coin Operations. Physical Review Letters. 104(5). 50502–50502.405 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Hillery, Mark, Erika Andersson, Stephen M. Barnett, & Daniel K. L. Oi. (2009). Decision problems with quantum black boxes. Journal of Modern Optics. 57(3). 244–252.3 indexed citations
15.
Schreiber, Andreas, K. N. Cassemiro, Václav Potoček, et al.. (2009). Photons Walking the Line. arXiv (Cornell University).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.