Eric D. Wish

100 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Eric D. Wish
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Toxicology 341
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Applied Psychology 280
  • Epidemiology 1.8k
  • Pharmacology 814
Replace Robert L. DuPont with:
Robert L. DuPont United States
Andrew Rosenblum United States
Wendy Swift Australia
Stephen Magura United States
John M. Roll United States
Martin Y. Iguchi United States
Simon H. Budman United States
Richard K. Ries United States
Edward J. Khantzian United States
Margaret L. Griffin United States
Eric D. Wish relative to Robert L. DuPont United States Robert L. DuPont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Robert L. DuPont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric D. Wish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric D. Wish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric D. Wish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric D. Wish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric D. Wish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric D. Wish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric D. Wish. The network helps show where Eric D. Wish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric D. Wish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric D. Wish Line = papers co-authored together Eric D. Wish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009283
2 2007184
3 2010168
4 2008166
5 2003135
6 2008135
7 2000132
8 2008127
9 1991118
10 2008110
11 1989109
12 2009103
13 201095
14 198888
15 197787
16 197785
17 199781
18 200880
19 199075
20 200871

About Eric D. Wish

Eric D. Wish is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Toxicology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (44 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (21 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (16 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (341 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Applied Psychology (280 citations), Epidemiology (1.8k citations) and Pharmacology (814 citations). Eric D. Wish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Amelia M. Arria, Kevin E. O’Grady, Kathryn B. Vincent, Kimberly M. Caldeira, Nena Messina, James Schmeidler, Estrellita Berry, Alan Getreu, Susanna Nemes and Richard Dembo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Drug Issues, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Substance Use & Misuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact