Erdal Yiğit

3.9k total citations
84 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Erdal Yiğit is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Erdal Yiğit has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30 papers in Atmospheric Science and 15 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Erdal Yiğit's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (63 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (39 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (27 papers). Erdal Yiğit is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (63 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (39 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (27 papers). Erdal Yiğit collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Erdal Yiğit's co-authors include Alexander S. Medvedev, P. Hartogh, A. D. Aylward, Takeshi Kuroda, S. England, W. E. Ward, A. J. Ridley, B. M. Jakosky, Katya Georgieva and Petra Koucká Knížová and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Physics Today.

In The Last Decade

Erdal Yiğit

80 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erdal Yiğit United States 26 2.3k 721 343 332 259 84 2.4k
Alexander S. Medvedev Germany 30 2.4k 1.0× 1.0k 1.4× 395 1.2× 193 0.6× 182 0.7× 79 2.6k
S. England United States 32 3.5k 1.5× 907 1.3× 513 1.5× 837 2.5× 823 3.2× 127 3.6k
E. R. Talaat United States 26 1.9k 0.8× 832 1.2× 326 1.0× 433 1.3× 415 1.6× 60 2.1k
M. P. Hickey United States 27 2.0k 0.9× 990 1.4× 436 1.3× 795 2.4× 178 0.7× 87 2.3k
Guiping Liu United States 21 993 0.4× 397 0.6× 76 0.2× 141 0.4× 130 0.5× 56 1.1k
S. Tellmann Germany 29 2.1k 0.9× 543 0.8× 49 0.1× 51 0.2× 94 0.4× 92 2.3k
David Parry Rubincam United States 20 1.9k 0.8× 349 0.5× 473 1.4× 292 0.9× 238 0.9× 76 2.1k
P. Rosenblatt Belgium 19 897 0.4× 172 0.2× 116 0.3× 94 0.3× 83 0.3× 69 1.0k
G. Fjeldbo United States 25 2.4k 1.0× 370 0.5× 332 1.0× 85 0.3× 178 0.7× 48 2.5k
A. D. Aylward United Kingdom 26 2.4k 1.0× 565 0.8× 233 0.7× 587 1.8× 702 2.7× 62 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Erdal Yiğit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erdal Yiğit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erdal Yiğit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erdal Yiğit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erdal Yiğit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erdal Yiğit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erdal Yiğit. The network helps show where Erdal Yiğit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erdal Yiğit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erdal Yiğit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erdal Yiğit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erdal Yiğit. Erdal Yiğit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Wu, Qian, Dong Lin, Wenbin Wang, et al.. (2025). Penetrating Electric Field With/Without Disturbed Electric Fields During the 7–8 July 2022 Geomagnetic Storm Simulated by MAGE and Observed by ICON MIGHTI. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 130(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Yiğit, Erdal, et al.. (2024). Ionospheric and Thermospheric Effects of Hurricane Grace in 2021 Observed by Satellites. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(10). 1 indexed citations
4.
Yiğit, Erdal, et al.. (2024). Response of the Thermosphere‐Ionosphere System to an X‐Class Solar Flare: 30 March 2022 Case Study. Space Weather. 22(10). 1 indexed citations
5.
Medvedev, Alexander S., Denis Belyaev, Erdal Yiğit, et al.. (2024). Climatology of gravity wave activity based on two Martian years from ACS/TGO observations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 683. A206–A206. 2 indexed citations
6.
Soto, Emmaris, et al.. (2023). Validation of E‐Region Model Electron Density Profiles With AURIC Utilizing High‐Resolution Cross Sections. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 128(10). 2 indexed citations
7.
Medvedev, Alexander S., G. P. Klaassen, & Erdal Yiğit. (2023). On the Dynamical Importance of Gravity Wave Sources Distributed Over Different Heights in the Atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 128(3). 10 indexed citations
8.
Yiğit, Erdal, Manbharat Dhadly, Alexander S. Medvedev, et al.. (2022). Characterization of the Thermospheric Mean Winds and Circulation During Solstice Using ICON/MIGHTI Observations. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 127(11). 9 indexed citations
9.
Yiğit, Erdal, Alexander S. Medvedev, & P. Hartogh. (2021). Variations of the Martian Thermospheric Gravity Wave Activity during the Recent Solar Minimum as Observed by MAVEN. arXiv (Cornell University). 14 indexed citations
10.
Kuroda, Takeshi, Alexander S. Medvedev, & Erdal Yiğit. (2020). Gravity Wave Activity in the Atmosphere of Mars During the 2018 Global Dust Storm: Simulations With a High‐Resolution Model. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 125(11). 32 indexed citations
11.
Miyoshi, Yasunobu & Erdal Yiğit. (2019). Impact of gravity wave drag on the thermospheric circulation: implementation of a nonlinear gravity wave parameterization in a whole-atmosphere model. Annales Geophysicae. 37(5). 955–969. 21 indexed citations
13.
Kutepov, A. A., L. Rezac, Konstantinos S. Kalogerakis, et al.. (2018). Atomic Oxygen Retrieved From the SABER 2.0‐ and 1.6‐μm Radiances Using New First‐Principles Nighttime OH(v) Model. Geophysical Research Letters. 45(11). 5798–5803. 26 indexed citations
14.
Yiğit, Erdal, Alexander S. Medvedev, & P. Hartogh. (2018). Influence of gravity waves on the climatology of high-altitude Martian carbon dioxide ice clouds. Annales Geophysicae. 36(6). 1631–1646. 25 indexed citations
15.
Bilitza, D., et al.. (2018). Improvements to Predictions of the Ionospheric Annual Anomaly by the International Reference Ionosphere Model. Biogeosciences (European Geosciences Union). 9 indexed citations
16.
Yiğit, Erdal, et al.. (2017). Solar and Geomagnetic Activity Relation for the Last two Solar Cycles. 12. 31–39. 8 indexed citations
17.
Kutepov, A. A., Konstantinos S. Kalogerakis, Diego Janches, et al.. (2017). Resolving the mesospheric nighttime 4.3 µm emission puzzle: comparison of the CO 2 ( ν 3 ) and OH( ν ) emission models. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 17(16). 9751–9760. 22 indexed citations
18.
Yiğit, Erdal, T. J. Immel, A. J. Ridley, H. U. Frey, & Mark B. Moldwin. (2016). General circulation modeling of the thermosphere-ionosphere during a geomagnetic storm. 41. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kutepov, A. A., Konstantinos S. Kalogerakis, Diego Janches, et al.. (2016). Resolving the mesospheric nighttime 4.3 μm emission puzzle: Newmodel calculations improve agreement with SABER observations. 1 indexed citations
20.
Medvedev, Alexander S., Francisco González‐Galindo, Erdal Yiğit, et al.. (2015). Cooling of the Martian thermosphere by CO2radiation and gravity waves: An intercomparison study with two general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 120(5). 913–927. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026