Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The quest for universal health coverage: achieving social protection for all in Mexico
2012369 citationsFelícia Marie Knaul, Eduardo González-Pier et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Enrique Ruelas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Enrique Ruelas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enrique Ruelas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enrique Ruelas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enrique Ruelas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enrique Ruelas. The network helps show where Enrique Ruelas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enrique Ruelas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enrique Ruelas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enrique Ruelas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Enrique Ruelas. Enrique Ruelas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Knaul, Felícia Marie, Eduardo González-Pier, Octavio Gómez‐Dantés, et al.. (2012). The quest for universal health coverage: achieving social protection for all in Mexico. The Lancet. 380(9849). 1259–1279.369 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Mytton, Oliver, Reiner Banken, Joseph L. Mathew, et al.. (2010). Introducing new technology safely. BMJ Quality & Safety. 19(Suppl 2). i9–i14.33 indexed citations
7.
Ruelas, Enrique. (2009). El camino hacia la certificación internacional de hospitales en México: The pathway to international certification of hospitals in Mexico. Revista CONAMED. 14(3). 5–7.1 indexed citations
8.
Puentes-Rosas, Esteban, et al.. (2005). Trato adecuado : respuesta del sistema mexicano de salud a las expectativas no médicas de sus usuarios. 47(1). 12–21.5 indexed citations
9.
Puentes-Rosas, Esteban, et al.. (2005). [Responsiveness of the Mexican health system].. PubMed. 47 Suppl 1. S12–21.4 indexed citations
Ruelas, Enrique, et al.. (1989). Framework for the analysis of quality assurance in transition: the case of Mexico.. PubMed. 9(1). 9–16.4 indexed citations
15.
Frenk, Julio, et al.. (1988). A conceptual model for public health research.. PubMed. 22(1). 60–71.10 indexed citations
16.
Ruelas, Enrique, et al.. (1987). La enseñanza en México de la administración de servicios de salud. Revista de Administración Pública. 1(69).
17.
Frenk, Julio, et al.. (1986). An innovative approach to public health research: the case of a new center in Mexico.. PubMed. 4(3). 467–81.4 indexed citations
18.
Frenk, Julio, et al.. (1986). Un modelo conceptual para la investigacion en salud publica. 101(5). 477–492.9 indexed citations
19.
Ruelas, Enrique & Peggy Leatt. (1985). The roles of physician-executives in hospitals: a framework for management education.. PubMed. 3(2 Pt 1). 151–69.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.