Enós E. Witmer

469 total citations
4 papers, 90 citations indexed

About

Enós E. Witmer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Enós E. Witmer has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 90 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Molecular Biology, 1 paper in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Enós E. Witmer's work include Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). Enós E. Witmer is often cited by papers focused on Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). Enós E. Witmer collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Enós E. Witmer's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Franklin Institute and American Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

Enós E. Witmer

4 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Enós E. Witmer United States	3	58	35	23	13	9	4	90
Hermann Weyl	1	82 1.4×	29 0.8×	17 0.7×	42 3.2×	4 0.4×	2	123
P. R. Saulson	2	73 1.3×	27 0.8×	24 1.0×	26 2.0×	1 0.1×	3	88
A. Einstein	3	86 1.5×	27 0.8×	35 1.5×	42 3.2×	1 0.1×	5	97
M. Chrétien	2	37 0.6×	23 0.7×	7 0.3×	17 1.3×		2	67
Joan Centrella United States	6	97 1.7×	12 0.3×	8 0.3×	53 4.1×		17	108
M. Piccolo Italy	6	17 0.3×	18 0.5×	8 0.3×	62 4.8×	4 0.4×	17	89
A. Marin Italy	2	35 0.6×	23 0.7×	4 0.2×	13 1.0×		2	47
R. de Sangro Italy	5	17 0.3×	18 0.5×	7 0.3×	21 1.6×	4 0.4×	12	49
R. Kayser Germany	8	221 3.8×	29 0.8×	5 0.2×	37 2.8×		23	228
G. Yu. Bogoslovsky Russia	10	242 4.2×	15 0.4×	153 6.7×	53 4.1×	1 0.1×	17	261

Countries citing papers authored by Enós E. Witmer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Enós E. Witmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enós E. Witmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enós E. Witmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Enós E. Witmer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enós E. Witmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enós E. Witmer. The network helps show where Enós E. Witmer may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

4 of 4 papers shown

1.

Witmer, Enós E.. (1968). Reply to Herman Erlichson. American Journal of Physics. 36(3). 277–277. 1 indexed citations

2.

Witmer, Enós E.. (1967). Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Future of Physics. American Journal of Physics. 35(1). 40–52. 9 indexed citations

3.

Witmer, Enós E.. (1965). Die mathematischen hilfsmittel des physikers. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 280(1). 93–93. 9 indexed citations

4.

Witmer, Enós E.. (1964). Gravitation and relativity. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 277(6). 616–617. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact