Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Triangular Norms
20001.2k citationsErich Peter Klement, Radko Mesiar et al.profile →
Aggregation Functions
2009980 citationsMichel Grabisch, Jean‐Luc Marichal et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Endre Pap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Endre Pap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endre Pap more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Endre Pap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Endre Pap. The network helps show where Endre Pap may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Endre Pap
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Endre Pap.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Endre Pap based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Endre Pap. Endre Pap is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dong, Jun, et al.. (2017). A choquet capacity and integral based method to identify the overall importance of engineering characteristics in quality function deployment. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH. 51(4). 297–314.2 indexed citations
Mesiar, Radko, Jun Li, & Endre Pap. (2010). The Choquet integral as Lebesgue integral and related inequalities. Kybernetika. 46(6). 1098–1107.57 indexed citations
10.
Pap, Endre, et al.. (2009). Asymmetrie general choquet integrals. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 6(1). 161–173.5 indexed citations
11.
Grabisch, Michel, Jean‐Luc Marichal, Radko Mesiar, & Endre Pap. (2009). Aggregation Functions (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications). Cambridge University Press eBooks.167 indexed citations
Pap, Endre, et al.. (2008). Orders in semirings of transition bistochastic matrices induced by mobility measure of social sciences. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 5(1). 87–96.2 indexed citations
Klement, Erich Peter, Radko Mesiar, & Endre Pap. (2007). A universal integral. European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference. 253–256.9 indexed citations
16.
Klement, Erich Peter, Radko Mesiar, & Endre Pap. (2005). TRANSFORMATIONS OF COPULAS. Kybernetika. 41(4). 425–434.42 indexed citations
17.
Klement, Erich Peter, Radko Mesiar, & Endre Pap. (2000). Triangular norms - basic properties and representation theorems. 63–81.11 indexed citations
18.
Pap, Endre. (1999). Daniell-Greco-Stone representation type theorem for autocontinuous from above functionals.. Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics. 29(1). 1–7.
19.
Pap, Endre & Nebojša Ralević. (1999). Pseudo-operations on finite intervals.. Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics. 29(1). 9–18.3 indexed citations
20.
Pap, Endre, et al.. (1995). Nikodým convergence theorem for uniform space valued functions defined on $D$-posets. Mathematica Slovaca. 45(4). 367–376.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.