Emmanuelle Opsommer

723 total citations
35 papers, 517 citations indexed

About

Emmanuelle Opsommer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Emmanuelle Opsommer has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 517 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Pharmacology, 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 9 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Emmanuelle Opsommer's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (18 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers). Emmanuelle Opsommer is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (18 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers). Emmanuelle Opsommer collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Belgium and Germany. Emmanuelle Opsommer's co-authors include Léon Plaghki, Wolfgang H. R. Miltner, Étienne Masquelier, Thomas Weiß, Geert Crombez, Veronika Schoeb, Gunther Landmann, Natalya Korogod, Julien Favre and Brigitte M. Jolles and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pain and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Emmanuelle Opsommer

30 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emmanuelle Opsommer Switzerland 13 189 183 114 83 73 35 517
Simon J. Summers Australia 12 251 1.3× 136 0.7× 81 0.7× 89 1.1× 61 0.8× 33 464
Divya Bharatkumar Adhia New Zealand 11 176 0.9× 130 0.7× 167 1.5× 72 0.9× 51 0.7× 41 496
Kevin J. Gertz United States 16 334 1.8× 169 0.9× 289 2.5× 169 2.0× 73 1.0× 29 777
Laura Condon United Kingdom 11 268 1.4× 263 1.4× 163 1.4× 140 1.7× 21 0.3× 26 718
Brenda L. Stoelb United States 13 354 1.9× 136 0.7× 260 2.3× 174 2.1× 149 2.0× 16 811
Paul van Wilgen Belgium 12 464 2.5× 210 1.1× 157 1.4× 246 3.0× 50 0.7× 28 775
Wei‐Ju Chang Australia 11 210 1.1× 174 1.0× 70 0.6× 78 0.9× 28 0.4× 35 466
Brian Budgell Canada 17 423 2.2× 75 0.4× 93 0.8× 72 0.9× 208 2.8× 58 888
Christine Short Canada 10 110 0.6× 97 0.5× 69 0.6× 98 1.2× 256 3.5× 13 503
Bárbara Zille de Queiroz Brazil 14 187 1.0× 257 1.4× 34 0.3× 145 1.7× 68 0.9× 32 620

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuelle Opsommer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuelle Opsommer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuelle Opsommer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuelle Opsommer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuelle Opsommer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuelle Opsommer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuelle Opsommer. The network helps show where Emmanuelle Opsommer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emmanuelle Opsommer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emmanuelle Opsommer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emmanuelle Opsommer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emmanuelle Opsommer. Emmanuelle Opsommer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cheung, Esther, Veronika Schoeb, Emmanuelle Opsommer, et al.. (2025). Lived Experiences of Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain and Implications on Their Daily Life: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. 7(2). 100456–100456.
2.
Landmann, Gunther, et al.. (2024). Explorative sensory profile evaluation in central neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. European Journal of Pain. 29(2). e4719–e4719.
3.
Korogod, Natalya, et al.. (2023). Physical activity and endogenous pain modulation in older people: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 22(2). 292–297.
4.
Kwan, Crystal, Emmanuelle Opsommer, Shahnawaz Anwer, et al.. (2023). Challenges, Concerns, and Experiences of Community-Dwelling Older Women with Chronic Low Back Pain—A Qualitative Study in Hong Kong, China. Healthcare. 11(7). 945–945. 4 indexed citations
5.
Korogod, Natalya, et al.. (2022). Physiological effects of Therapeutic Body Wraps in healthy volunteers: An observational study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 41. 114–123.
6.
Schoeb, Veronika, et al.. (2022). Experiences of community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain in Hong Kong and Switzerland – A qualitative study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 920387–920387. 12 indexed citations
7.
Marić, Filip, Kenneth Chance-Larsen, Julia Chevan, et al.. (2021). A progress report on planetary health, environmental and sustainability education in physiotherapy – Editorial. European Journal of Physiotherapy. 23(4). 201–202. 18 indexed citations
8.
Sattelmayer, Martin, et al.. (2021). Development of an exercise programme for balance abilities in people with multiple sclerosis: a development of concept study using Rasch analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 29–29. 3 indexed citations
9.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, et al.. (2021). Multimodal sensory evaluation of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: an experimental study. Spinal Cord. 59(8). 842–854. 4 indexed citations
10.
Osthoff, Anne-Kathrin Rausch, Heiner Baur, Markus Wirz, et al.. (2021). Physiotherapists’ use and perceptions of digital remote physiotherapy during COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland: an online cross-sectional survey. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 18–18. 41 indexed citations
12.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, Gilles Rivier, Geert Crombez, & Roger Hilfiker. (2017). The predictive value of subsets of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for return to work in chronic low back pain. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 53(3). 359–365. 15 indexed citations
13.
Hilfiker, Roger, et al.. (2016). Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal. 25(9). 2741–2749. 8 indexed citations
15.
16.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, Jean‐Michel Guérit, & Léon Plaghki. (2003). Exogenous and endogenous components of ultralate (C-fibre) evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimuli to tiny skin surface areas in healthy subjects. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 33(2). 78–85. 16 indexed citations
17.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, et al.. (2001). Scalp topography of ultralate (C-fibres) evoked potentials following thulium YAG laser stimuli to tiny skin surface areas in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology. 112(10). 1868–1874. 40 indexed citations
18.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, et al.. (2001). Dipole analysis of ultralate (C-fibres) evoked potentials after laser stimulation of tiny cutaneous surface areas in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 298(1). 41–44. 71 indexed citations
20.
Opsommer, Emmanuelle, Étienne Masquelier, & Léon Plaghki. (1999). Determination of nerve conduction velocity of C-fibres in humans from thermal thresholds to contact heat (thermode) and from evoked brain potentials to radiant heat (CO2 laser). Neurophysiologie Clinique. 29(5). 411–422. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026