Emma Withers

28 total papers · 1.1k total citations
15 papers, 662 citations indexed

About

Emma Withers is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Withers has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 662 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pharmacology, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Emma Withers's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers). Emma Withers is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers). Emma Withers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bangladesh and United States. Emma Withers's co-authors include Sarah E Lamb, Martin Underwood, Ranjit Lall, Zara Hansen, E Castelnuovo, Vivien Nichols, Rachel Potter, Esther Williamson, Mark A. Williams and Simon Gates and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Emma Withers

15 papers receiving 633 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma Withers 385 173 106 106 100 15 662
Jill C. Slaboda 406 1.1× 183 1.1× 68 0.6× 42 0.4× 131 1.3× 30 764
Peter Oesch 458 1.2× 186 1.1× 179 1.7× 62 0.6× 150 1.5× 44 781
Jennifer A. Klaber Moffett 520 1.4× 147 0.8× 135 1.3× 109 1.0× 141 1.4× 18 775
Tarcisio F de Campos 558 1.4× 141 0.8× 185 1.7× 74 0.7× 71 0.7× 19 763
Martin Friedrich 449 1.2× 202 1.2× 177 1.7× 39 0.4× 87 0.9× 26 758
Susan J. Lieber 560 1.5× 173 1.0× 113 1.1× 41 0.4× 45 0.5× 17 706
Carrie Ritchie 383 1.0× 131 0.8× 114 1.1× 48 0.5× 110 1.1× 36 681
Matthew L. Stevens 472 1.2× 145 0.8× 115 1.1× 54 0.5× 121 1.2× 36 748
Lars Morsø 580 1.5× 140 0.8× 261 2.5× 186 1.8× 101 1.0× 46 756
Inge Ris 557 1.4× 128 0.7× 234 2.2× 63 0.6× 56 0.6× 28 685

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Withers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Withers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Withers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Withers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Withers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Withers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Withers. The network helps show where Emma Withers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Withers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Withers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Withers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Withers. Emma Withers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026