Emma Stuart

763 total citations
9 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Stuart has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 3 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Emma Stuart's work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (3 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Emma Stuart is often cited by papers focused on Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (3 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Emma Stuart collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Germany. Emma Stuart's co-authors include Marissa J. Scandlyn, Rhonda J. Rosengren, Rhonda J. Rosengren, Tiffany J. Somers‐Edgar, Lesley Larsen, Stephen R. Haines, Amanda J. Gibson, Robert Patterson, Dirk Werling and Bernardo Villarreal‐Ramos and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Cancer and Life Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emma Stuart

9 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Stuart New Zealand 9 178 177 110 101 84 9 562
Marissa J. Scandlyn New Zealand 7 175 1.0× 160 0.9× 99 0.9× 94 0.9× 75 0.9× 7 549
Mitali Pandey India 15 499 2.8× 101 0.6× 86 0.8× 69 0.7× 35 0.4× 38 962
Insu P. Lee United States 13 160 0.9× 149 0.8× 65 0.6× 61 0.6× 66 0.8× 20 561
Andrea Kapinová Slovakia 12 295 1.7× 49 0.3× 106 1.0× 52 0.5× 19 0.2× 23 618
Archana Sengupta India 13 158 0.9× 59 0.3× 111 1.0× 43 0.4× 15 0.2× 20 495
Komsak Pintha Thailand 17 235 1.3× 47 0.3× 102 0.9× 136 1.3× 9 0.1× 36 706
Kanokkarn Phromnoi Thailand 13 329 1.8× 62 0.4× 123 1.1× 91 0.9× 8 0.1× 18 767
J. Bausch Switzerland 13 221 1.2× 336 1.9× 275 2.5× 24 0.2× 30 0.4× 15 785
Keihan Ghatreh Samani Iran 15 181 1.0× 47 0.3× 32 0.3× 37 0.4× 18 0.2× 58 545

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Stuart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Stuart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Stuart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Stuart. Emma Stuart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Gibson, Amanda J., et al.. (2016). Differential macrophage function in Brown Swiss and Holstein Friesian cattle. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 181. 15–23. 21 indexed citations
2.
Thiem, Stefan, et al.. (2016). Inducible gene modification in the gastric epithelium of Tff1‐CreERT2, Tff2‐rtTA, Tff3‐luc mice. genesis. 54(12). 626–635. 8 indexed citations
3.
Haines, Stephen R., et al.. (2010). Deer velvet supplementation decreases the grade and metastasis of azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in the male rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 48(5). 1288–1292. 15 indexed citations
4.
Scandlyn, Marissa J., Emma Stuart, & Rhonda J. Rosengren. (2008). Sex-specific differences in CYP450 isoforms in humans. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 4(4). 413–424. 153 indexed citations
5.
Stuart, Emma & Rhonda J. Rosengren. (2008). The combination of raloxifene and epigallocatechin gallate suppresses growth and induces apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. Life Sciences. 82(17-18). 943–948. 25 indexed citations
6.
Scandlyn, Marissa J., et al.. (2008). A new role for tamoxifen in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer when it is combined with epigallocatechin gallate. British Journal of Cancer. 99(7). 1056–1063. 72 indexed citations
7.
Somers‐Edgar, Tiffany J., et al.. (2007). The combination of epigallocatechin gallate and curcumin suppresses ERα‐breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Cancer. 122(9). 1966–1971. 115 indexed citations
8.
Stuart, Emma, Lesley Larsen, & Rhonda J. Rosengren. (2007). Potential mechanisms for the synergistic cytotoxicity elicited by 4-hydroxytamoxifen and epigallocatechin gallate in MDA-MB-231 cells. International Journal of Oncology. 30(6). 1407–12. 16 indexed citations
9.
Stuart, Emma, Marissa J. Scandlyn, & Rhonda J. Rosengren. (2006). Role of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in the treatment of breast and prostate cancer. Life Sciences. 79(25). 2329–2336. 137 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026