Emma Stuart

12 total papers · 758 total citations
9 papers, 557 citations indexed

About

Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Stuart has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 557 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 3 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Emma Stuart's work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (3 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Emma Stuart is often cited by papers focused on Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (3 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Emma Stuart collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Germany. Emma Stuart's co-authors include Marissa J. Scandlyn, Rhonda J. Rosengren, Rhonda J. Rosengren, Tiffany J. Somers‐Edgar, Lesley Larsen, Amanda J. Gibson, Dirk Werling, Robert Patterson, Bernardo Villarreal‐Ramos and Stephen R. Haines and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Cancer and Life Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emma Stuart

9 papers receiving 548 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma Stuart 177 177 110 100 84 9 557
Marissa J. Scandlyn 174 1.0× 160 0.9× 99 0.9× 93 0.9× 75 0.9× 7 544
Mohammed A. Alsahli 169 1.0× 111 0.6× 62 0.6× 50 0.5× 33 0.4× 15 674
Madhumitha Kedhari Sundaram 408 2.3× 118 0.7× 72 0.7× 58 0.6× 35 0.4× 15 628
Insu P. Lee 162 0.9× 150 0.8× 65 0.6× 61 0.6× 66 0.8× 20 564
Anshu M. Roy 282 1.6× 85 0.5× 70 0.6× 98 1.0× 36 0.4× 12 541
Claudia Musiał 174 1.0× 231 1.3× 175 1.6× 34 0.3× 21 0.3× 11 672
Keisuke Akagi 207 1.2× 205 1.2× 176 1.6× 49 0.5× 71 0.8× 21 568
Sabeeha Ali 213 1.2× 113 0.6× 72 0.7× 47 0.5× 28 0.3× 12 595
Evgeny A. Rogozin 299 1.7× 127 0.7× 187 1.7× 60 0.6× 39 0.5× 9 553
Chao‐Ying Lee 273 1.5× 73 0.4× 56 0.5× 57 0.6× 22 0.3× 14 565

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Stuart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Stuart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Stuart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Stuart. Emma Stuart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026