Emma Stone

2.2k citations
29 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Stone

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Emma Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Developmental Biology 157
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 633
  • Ecological Modeling 133
  • Ecology 757
  • Global and Planetary Change 531
Replace Liam P. McGuire with:
Liam P. McGuire Canada
Albert M. Manville United States
Clare Stawski Australia
Ian R. Cleasby United Kingdom
Greg Marshall United States
P. I. Webb United Kingdom
Juan F. Beltrán Spain
Debra M. Shier United States
Benjamin P. Y.‐H. Lee Singapore
Kyler Abernathy United States
Emma Stone relative to Liam P. McGuire Canada Liam P. McGuire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Liam P. McGuire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stone. The network helps show where Emma Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Stone Line = papers co-authored together Emma Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009312
2 2015164
3 2012145
4 2002130
5 2008127
6 201759
7 201554
8 201651
9 201548
10 201844
11 200834
12 202128
13 201625
14 202019
15 201313
16 201512
17 202212
18 202210
19 20227
20 20246

About Emma Stone

Emma Stone is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Small Animals and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (14 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Marine animal studies overview (8 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (8 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (157 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (633 citations), Ecological Modeling (133 citations), Ecology (757 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (531 citations). Emma Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Harris, Gareth Jones, Philip J. Baker, Innes C. Cuthill, Patricia Price, Robert S. Davis, Karey Cheong, Martyn A. French, Richard W. Yarnell and Dexing Huang. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Mammalian Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Global Change Biology and Conservation Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact