Emma Johns

37 total papers · 3.4k total citations
14 papers, 754 citations indexed

About

Emma Johns is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Johns has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 754 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emma Johns's work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers). Emma Johns is often cited by papers focused on Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers). Emma Johns collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Emma Johns's co-authors include Rebecca M. Reynolds, Fiona C. Denison, Jane E. Norman, I. P. Mulligan, C. C. Ashley, Naveed Sattar, Christopher Ashley, Anna R. Dover, David Ryan and Renata L. Riha and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism and Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

In The Last Decade

Emma Johns

14 papers receiving 734 citations

Hit Papers

Gestational Diabetes Mell... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma Johns 524 242 147 101 92 14 754
Li Lu 375 0.7× 163 0.7× 170 1.2× 91 0.9× 42 0.5× 16 730
F Galtier-Dereure 440 0.8× 268 1.1× 183 1.2× 90 0.9× 35 0.4× 13 871
Ashi Daftary 608 1.2× 346 1.4× 94 0.6× 60 0.6× 61 0.7× 20 821
Alessandra Ghio 618 1.2× 348 1.4× 246 1.7× 36 0.4× 43 0.5× 13 740
Surab Vadachkoria 553 1.1× 338 1.4× 80 0.5× 133 1.3× 36 0.4× 16 759
Louise Kelstrup 641 1.2× 384 1.6× 193 1.3× 130 1.3× 21 0.2× 21 840
Azadeh Houshmand‐Oeregaard 466 0.9× 280 1.2× 129 0.9× 122 1.2× 16 0.2× 11 620
Nikolaos Vitoratos 452 0.9× 315 1.3× 93 0.6× 70 0.7× 34 0.4× 32 799
Elena Bordiú 465 0.9× 173 0.7× 287 2.0× 52 0.5× 60 0.7× 33 816
Maritta Pöyhönen‐Alho 548 1.0× 187 0.8× 296 2.0× 29 0.3× 104 1.1× 20 764

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Johns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Johns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Johns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Johns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Johns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Johns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Johns. The network helps show where Emma Johns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Johns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Johns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Johns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Johns. Emma Johns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026