Emma J. Ste.Marie

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 872 citations indexed

About

Emma J. Ste.Marie is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma J. Ste.Marie has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 872 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Biochemistry and 2 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Emma J. Ste.Marie's work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (3 papers) and Biochemical and Structural Characterization (2 papers). Emma J. Ste.Marie is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (3 papers) and Biochemical and Structural Characterization (2 papers). Emma J. Ste.Marie collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emma J. Ste.Marie's co-authors include Robert J. Hondal, Sushmita Mukherjee, Saravanan S. Karuppagounder, Youxi Ai, Ishraq Alim, Vivek Swarup, John W. Cave, Javier Seravalli, Elena Ivanova and Botir T. Sagdullaev and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Biochemistry and The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

In The Last Decade

Emma J. Ste.Marie

9 papers receiving 869 citations

Hit Papers

Selenium Drives a Transcriptional Adaptive Program to Blo... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma J. Ste.Marie United States 7 507 485 366 145 61 9 872
Yun Sun China 8 331 0.7× 380 0.8× 174 0.5× 58 0.4× 40 0.7× 11 732
Shyamalagauri Jadhav United States 8 344 0.7× 360 0.7× 239 0.7× 128 0.9× 51 0.8× 11 694
Mingzhu Tang China 11 220 0.4× 329 0.7× 170 0.5× 42 0.3× 35 0.6× 22 685
Fábio Alessandro de Freitas Brazil 7 202 0.4× 263 0.5× 141 0.4× 43 0.3× 29 0.5× 15 463
Yue‐Chen Zhao China 8 259 0.5× 288 0.6× 218 0.6× 38 0.3× 59 1.0× 22 548
Jie-Jie Zhang China 13 243 0.5× 313 0.6× 189 0.5× 30 0.2× 34 0.6× 14 572
Yasuhiro Horibata Japan 17 227 0.4× 546 1.1× 51 0.1× 100 0.7× 16 0.3× 46 983
Soo‐Yeon Park South Korea 17 155 0.3× 508 1.0× 142 0.4× 23 0.2× 154 2.5× 51 809
Hannah Lee United States 5 148 0.3× 932 1.9× 164 0.4× 93 0.6× 59 1.0× 11 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma J. Ste.Marie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma J. Ste.Marie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma J. Ste.Marie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma J. Ste.Marie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma J. Ste.Marie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma J. Ste.Marie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma J. Ste.Marie. The network helps show where Emma J. Ste.Marie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma J. Ste.Marie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma J. Ste.Marie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma J. Ste.Marie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma J. Ste.Marie. Emma J. Ste.Marie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Wheater, Michelle, et al.. (2021). The Marine Neurotoxin Brevetoxin (PbTx-2) Inhibits Karenia brevis and Mammalian Thioredoxin Reductases by Targeting Different Residues. Journal of Natural Products. 84(11). 2961–2970. 12 indexed citations
2.
Remington, Jacob M., Chenyi Liao, Emma J. Ste.Marie, et al.. (2020). Aggregation State of Synergistic Antimicrobial Peptides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 11(21). 9501–9506. 21 indexed citations
3.
Ste.Marie, Emma J., et al.. (2020). Can Selenoenzymes Resist Electrophilic Modification? Evidence from Thioredoxin Reductase and a Mutant Containing α-Methylselenocysteine. Biochemistry. 59(36). 3300–3315. 11 indexed citations
4.
Ste.Marie, Emma J., et al.. (2019). Synthesis of alpha‐methyl selenocysteine and its utilization as a glutathione peroxidase mimic. Journal of Peptide Science. 25(6). e3173–e3173. 3 indexed citations
5.
Ste.Marie, Emma J., et al.. (2019). Facile removal of 4‐methoxybenzyl protecting group from selenocysteine. Journal of Peptide Science. 25(10). e3209–e3209. 5 indexed citations
6.
Alim, Ishraq, Yingxin Chen, Vivek Swarup, et al.. (2019). Selenium Drives a Transcriptional Adaptive Program to Block Ferroptosis and Treat Stroke. Cell. 177(5). 1262–1279.e25. 780 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Ste.Marie, Emma J. & Robert J. Hondal. (2019). 2,2′‐Dipyridyl diselenide: A chemoselective tool for cysteine deprotection and disulfide bond formation. Journal of Peptide Science. 26(3). e3236–e3236. 7 indexed citations
8.
Ste.Marie, Emma J. & Robert J. Hondal. (2018). Reduction of cysteine‐S‐protecting groups by triisopropylsilane. Journal of Peptide Science. 24(11). e3130–e3130. 17 indexed citations
9.
Ste.Marie, Emma J., Erik L. Ruggles, & Robert J. Hondal. (2016). Removal of the 5‐nitro‐2‐pyridine‐sulfenyl protecting group from selenocysteine and cysteine by ascorbolysis. Journal of Peptide Science. 22(9). 571–576. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026