Emma Hooper

473 total citations
10 papers, 76 citations indexed

About

Emma Hooper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Hooper has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 76 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emma Hooper's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (3 papers). Emma Hooper is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (3 papers). Emma Hooper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Emma Hooper's co-authors include Iracema Leroi, Tracy Collins, Piers Dawes, Christopher J. Armitage, Laura Brown, Chryssoula Thodi, Barbara E. Weinstein, Carrie L. Nieman, Christine Dickinson and Michael A. Bowen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Gerontology and Frontiers in Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Emma Hooper

9 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Hooper United Kingdom 4 42 38 21 18 15 10 76
Saima Sheikh United Kingdom 5 44 1.0× 29 0.8× 17 0.8× 23 1.3× 13 0.9× 14 99
Maël Dieudonné France 6 14 0.3× 39 1.0× 8 0.4× 42 2.3× 5 0.3× 15 142
Rebecca F. Gottesman United States 4 14 0.3× 7 0.2× 5 0.2× 41 2.3× 10 0.7× 7 113
Carrie Ciro United States 7 12 0.3× 4 0.1× 49 2.3× 25 1.4× 2 0.1× 19 115
Jane Bulger United States 8 6 0.1× 12 0.3× 14 0.7× 18 1.0× 16 121
Matti Mizrachi Israel 3 24 0.6× 5 0.1× 3 0.1× 2 0.1× 16 1.1× 7 73
William P. French United States 5 22 0.5× 11 0.3× 24 1.1× 33 1.8× 16 92
Hariklia Proios Greece 8 30 0.7× 14 0.4× 5 0.2× 14 0.8× 1 0.1× 26 123
R. S. Moore United States 5 61 1.5× 4 0.1× 13 0.6× 21 1.2× 7 126
Ana Rita Martins Portugal 6 23 0.5× 13 0.3× 5 0.2× 12 0.7× 16 137

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Hooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Hooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Hooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Hooper. The network helps show where Emma Hooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Hooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Hooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Hooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Hooper. Emma Hooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Hooper, Emma, Laura Brown, Piers Dawes, Iracema Leroi, & Christopher J. Armitage. (2024). What are the Correlates of Hearing Aid Use for People Living With Dementia?. Journal of Aging and Health. 37(3-4). 210–219.
2.
Hooper, Emma, et al.. (2024). Enablers and Barriers to Hearing aid Use in People Living With Dementia. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 43(7). 978–989. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hooper, Emma, et al.. (2022). Systematic Review of Factors Associated With Hearing Aid Use in People Living in the Community With Dementia and Age-Related Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 23(10). 1669–1675.e16. 13 indexed citations
4.
Bowen, Michael A., Fofi Constantinidou, Piers Dawes, et al.. (2021). International Practice Recommendations for the Recognition and Management of Hearing and Vision Impairment in People with Dementia. Gerontology. 68(2). 121–135. 24 indexed citations
5.
Dawes, Piers, et al.. (2021). 801 EFFECTIVENESS OF HEARING REHABILITATION FOR CARE HOME RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 23(3). 450–460.e4. 2 indexed citations
6.
Sheikh, Saima, Emma Hooper, Jahanara Miah, et al.. (2021). SENSE-Cog Asia: A Feasibility Study of a Hearing Intervention to Improve Outcomes in People With Dementia. Frontiers in Neurology. 12. 654143–654143. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hooper, Emma, Déborah Oliveira, Flora Guerra, et al.. (2020). Challenges in public perception: highlights from the United Kingdom-Brazil Dementia Workshop. Dementia & Neuropsychologia. 14(3). 209–215. 2 indexed citations
8.
Leroi, Iracema, Christopher J. Armitage, Éric Frison, et al.. (2020). A randomised controlled trial of hearing and vision support in dementia: Protocol for a process evaluation in the SENSE-Cog trial. Trials. 21(1). 223–223. 3 indexed citations
10.
Hooper, Emma & Tracy Collins. (2016). An occupational perspective of the lived experience of familial dementia caregivers: A thematic review of qualitative literature. Dementia. 18(1). 323–346. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026