Emma Göthe
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Papers in
- Ecology 14
- Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology 10
- Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior 4
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes 3
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 5
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Leonard Sandin (7 shared papers)David G. Angeler (5 shared papers)Annette Baattrup‐Pedersen (7 shared papers)Nikolai Friberg (4 shared papers)Tenna Riis (4 shared papers)Matthew T. O’Hare (2 shared papers)Esben Astrup Kristensen (2 shared papers)Peter Wiberg‐Larsen (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Emma Göthe
17 papers receiving 573 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 313
- Ecology 455
- Environmental Chemistry 157
- Ecological Modeling 65
- Water Science and Technology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Göthe
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Göthe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Göthe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Göthe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Göthe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Göthe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Göthe. The network helps show where Emma Göthe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Göthe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 2 |
About Emma Göthe
Emma Göthe is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Water Science and Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (10 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers) and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (313 citations), Ecology (455 citations), Environmental Chemistry (157 citations), Ecological Modeling (65 citations) and Water Science and Technology (72 citations). Emma Göthe has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Sandin, David G. Angeler, Annette Baattrup‐Pedersen, Nikolai Friberg, Tenna Riis, Matthew T. O’Hare, Esben Astrup Kristensen, Peter Wiberg‐Larsen, Steffi Gottschalk and Stefan Löfgren. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, Journal of Applied Ecology, PLoS ONE, Freshwater Biology and Journal of Animal Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.