Emma Forbes

892 citations
12 papers · 800 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Fungal Biology and Applications
    • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
    • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics

Papers in

    • Fungal Biology and Applications 3
    • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 2
    • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2

Emma Forbes

12 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Emma Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Pharmacology 191
  • Plant Science 345
  • Cell Biology 139
  • Molecular Biology 522
  • Biochemistry 46
Replace Jean‐Alain Pocard with:
Jean‐Alain Pocard France
Donald V. Richmond United Kingdom
K. J. Scott Australia
T. K. Tan Singapore
Robert W. Dunlop South Africa
Adrien Y. Burch United States
Laurence Meslet‐Cladière France
Tomomichi Yanagita Japan
Betty L. Wong United States
Gunter M. Rothe Germany
Emma Forbes relative to Jean‐Alain Pocard France Jean‐Alain Pocard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Jean‐Alain Pocard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Forbes. The network helps show where Emma Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Emma Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Forbes Line = papers co-authored together Emma Forbes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1965201
2 1953154
3 2001117
4 197388
5 195482
6 195961
7 201647
8 197438
9 19734
10 19983
11 20203
12 19812

About Emma Forbes

Emma Forbes is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (6 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (2 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (191 citations), Plant Science (345 citations), Cell Biology (139 citations), Molecular Biology (522 citations) and Biochemistry (46 citations). Emma Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. Pontecorvo, J. A. Roper, Joe Pateman, J. R. Kinghorn, Richard D. Newcomb, Philip Batterham, John A. McKenzie, Zhenzhong Chen, Ulf Büntgen and Rob Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Journal of Bacteriology, Medical Mycology, Journal of Archaeological Science and Genetics Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact