Emma B.H. Hume

2.2k total citations
54 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Emma B.H. Hume is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma B.H. Hume has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Ophthalmology, 22 papers in Molecular Biology and 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Emma B.H. Hume's work include Ocular Infections and Treatments (37 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (20 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (13 papers). Emma B.H. Hume is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Infections and Treatments (37 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (20 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (13 papers). Emma B.H. Hume collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Emma B.H. Hume's co-authors include Mark Willcox, Nerida Cole, Naresh Kumar, Richard J. O’Callaghan, Yulina Aliwarga, Judy M. Moreau, Laura A. Poole‐Warren, K. W. Knox, Ajay Kumar Vijay and H.J. Oakey and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biomaterials and Infection and Immunity.

In The Last Decade

Emma B.H. Hume

54 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma B.H. Hume Australia 24 660 504 474 354 320 54 1.7k
Eric G. Romanowski United States 33 910 1.4× 1.6k 3.2× 706 1.5× 783 2.2× 329 1.0× 145 4.1k
Debarun Dutta Australia 24 596 0.9× 327 0.6× 447 0.9× 784 2.2× 52 0.2× 63 1.6k
Regis P. Kowalski United States 31 489 0.7× 2.4k 4.7× 751 1.6× 192 0.5× 349 1.1× 161 3.6k
Mary E. Marquart United States 24 458 0.7× 530 1.1× 300 0.6× 124 0.4× 194 0.6× 80 1.6k
Bradley D. Jett United States 18 617 0.9× 667 1.3× 169 0.4× 120 0.3× 474 1.5× 19 1.8k
Constantine G. Haidaris United States 30 765 1.2× 113 0.2× 309 0.7× 219 0.6× 1.1k 3.4× 76 3.4k
Kathleen A. Yates United States 21 207 0.3× 503 1.0× 252 0.5× 223 0.6× 130 0.4× 61 1.2k
Veronica Folliero Italy 23 439 0.7× 116 0.2× 149 0.3× 293 0.8× 213 0.7× 77 1.5k
Juliana Campos Junqueira Brazil 38 764 1.2× 307 0.6× 172 0.4× 461 1.3× 1.5k 4.6× 165 4.1k
Joveeta Joseph India 26 292 0.4× 917 1.8× 234 0.5× 81 0.2× 204 0.6× 145 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma B.H. Hume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma B.H. Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma B.H. Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma B.H. Hume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma B.H. Hume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma B.H. Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma B.H. Hume. The network helps show where Emma B.H. Hume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma B.H. Hume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma B.H. Hume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma B.H. Hume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma B.H. Hume. Emma B.H. Hume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hume, Emma B.H., et al.. (2020). The role of staphopain a in Staphylococcus aureus keratitis. Experimental Eye Research. 193. 107994–107994. 14 indexed citations
3.
Cole, Nerida, et al.. (2014). The role of CXC chemokine receptor 2 in Staphylococcus aureus keratitis. Experimental Eye Research. 127. 184–189. 12 indexed citations
4.
Cole, Nerida, et al.. (2010). The Role of Glyceraldehyde Phosphate Dehydrogenase in the Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 3889–3889. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hume, Emma B.H., et al.. (2009). Investigating Specific Virulence Factors Involved in Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3457–3457. 3 indexed citations
6.
Willcox, Mark, Emma B.H. Hume, Yulina Aliwarga, Naresh Kumar, & Nerida Cole. (2008). A novel cationic-peptide coating for the prevention of microbial colonization on contact lenses. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 105(6). 1817–1825. 185 indexed citations
7.
Cole, Nerida, Emma B.H. Hume, Linda Garthwaite, et al.. (2007). The Role of CXC Chemokine Receptor Two in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Corneal Infection. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 2660–2660. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hume, Emma B.H., et al.. (2007). Efficacy of Contact Lens Multipurpose Solutions Against Serratia Marcescens. Optometry and Vision Science. 84(4). 316–320. 32 indexed citations
9.
Cole, Nerida, Emma B.H. Hume, Michele C. Madigan, et al.. (2005). Contribution of the cornea to cytokine levels in the whole eye induced during the early phase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge. Immunology and Cell Biology. 83(3). 301–306. 21 indexed citations
10.
Zhu, Hua, et al.. (2005). Effects of α-Toxin-DeficientStaphylococcus aureuson the Production of Peripheral Corneal Ulceration in an Animal Model. Current Eye Research. 30(1). 63–70. 15 indexed citations
11.
Willcox, Mark, Nerida Cole, Emma B.H. Hume, et al.. (2004). Contact lenses coated with protamine reduce bacterial adhesion and the production of Contact Lens Induced Acute Red Eye (CLARE). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1568–1568. 2 indexed citations
12.
Krishnan, Ramesh, Nerida Cole, Isabelle Jalbert, Emma B.H. Hume, & Mark Willcox. (2004). Effect of Topical 12–methyltetradecanoic acid during Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 4957–4957. 1 indexed citations
13.
Hume, Emma B.H., Robert A. Sack, Fiona Stapleton, & Mark Willcox. (2004). Induction of cytokines from polymorphonuclear leukocytes and epithelial cells by ocular isolates ofSerratia marcescens. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 12(4). 287–295. 15 indexed citations
14.
Dajcs, Joseph J., Gregory D. Sloop, Judy M. Moreau, et al.. (2002). Corneal pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman.. PubMed. 43(4). 1109–15. 40 indexed citations
15.
Moreau, Judy M., Emma B.H. Hume, Joseph J. Dajcs, et al.. (2002). Effectiveness of Mupirocin and Polymyxin B in Experimental Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens Keratitis. Cornea. 21(8). 807–811. 15 indexed citations
16.
Hume, Emma B.H. & Mark Willcox. (2001). Survival of Serratia marcescens in the Presence of Complement. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. 13(1). 55–62. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hume, Emma B.H. & Mark Willcox. (2001). Survival ofSerratia marcescensin the Presence of Complement. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. 13(1). 3 indexed citations
18.
Hume, Emma B.H., et al.. (2000). Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit.. PubMed. 41(6). 1432–7. 65 indexed citations
19.
Hume, Emma B.H., et al.. (1994). An appraisal of the virulence factors associated with streptococcal endocarditis. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 40(2). 110–114. 27 indexed citations
20.
Patrikakis, Margaret, et al.. (1993). The aggregation of human platelets by Lactobacillus species. Journal of General Microbiology. 139(12). 2945–2951. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026