Emily Williams

27 total papers · 471 total citations
14 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Emily Williams is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Williams has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Emily Williams's work include Climate variability and models (7 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (4 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers). Emily Williams is often cited by papers focused on Climate variability and models (7 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (4 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers). Emily Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Ethiopia. Emily Williams's co-authors include Ana P. Barros, Stephen W. Nesbitt, Chris Funk, Shraddhanand Shukla, Leah Stokes, James Rowland, Diego Pedreros, J. P. Verdin, Diriba Korecha and Molly E. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society and Climatic Change.

In The Last Decade

Emily Williams

14 papers receiving 335 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily Williams 238 214 35 27 26 14 343
K. Savvidou 260 1.1× 155 0.7× 68 1.9× 19 0.7× 35 1.3× 17 321
K. Nicolaides 263 1.1× 158 0.7× 71 2.0× 19 0.7× 39 1.5× 18 340
Pablo Lagos 131 0.6× 170 0.8× 88 2.5× 19 0.7× 33 1.3× 13 355
Farhang Ahmadi‐Givi 309 1.3× 272 1.3× 40 1.1× 27 1.0× 26 1.0× 16 373
P. Chittibabu 173 0.7× 253 1.2× 15 0.4× 41 1.5× 17 0.7× 19 402
Peyman Saemian 254 1.1× 115 0.5× 113 3.2× 47 1.7× 50 1.9× 16 399
Anumeha Dube 221 0.9× 188 0.9× 40 1.1× 11 0.4× 31 1.2× 26 377
Christine M. McKenna 312 1.3× 278 1.3× 15 0.4× 13 0.5× 14 0.5× 15 395
Faize Sarış 228 1.0× 124 0.6× 57 1.6× 14 0.5× 57 2.2× 20 359
Stacey Lee Osbrough 269 1.1× 149 0.7× 41 1.2× 9 0.3× 15 0.6× 19 317

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Williams. The network helps show where Emily Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Williams. Emily Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026