Emily Stenhouse

889 total citations
7 papers, 654 citations indexed

About

Emily Stenhouse is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Stenhouse has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 654 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 3 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emily Stenhouse's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). Emily Stenhouse is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). Emily Stenhouse collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Emily Stenhouse's co-authors include Jennifer A. Crossley, J. M. Connor, Alan D. Cameron, David A. Aitken, Gordon C. S. Smith, J. Webb, Fiona Mackenzie, Chris Hardwick, Carl F. Davis and Lindsey Hunter and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and The Journal of Pediatrics.

In The Last Decade

Emily Stenhouse

7 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Stenhouse United Kingdom	5	479	398	108	92	75	7	654
Elisa Bevilacqua Italy	14	378 0.8×	170 0.4×	102 0.9×	110 1.2×	34 0.5×	53	586
Karen R. Wøjdemann Denmark	15	558 1.2×	409 1.0×	126 1.2×	156 1.7×	31 0.4×	25	724
G. Albaigés Spain	10	542 1.1×	585 1.5×	32 0.3×	81 0.9×	40 0.5×	21	690
M. Metzenbauer Austria	18	785 1.6×	680 1.7×	122 1.1×	116 1.3×	61 0.8×	26	989
Fionnuala Mone United Kingdom	17	472 1.0×	277 0.7×	72 0.7×	94 1.0×	44 0.6×	60	666
Sermet Sağol Türkiye	14	257 0.5×	303 0.8×	101 0.9×	116 1.3×	66 0.9×	37	566
Beatrice Mosimann Switzerland	12	285 0.6×	308 0.8×	56 0.5×	66 0.7×	16 0.2×	41	494
Fang He China	10	212 0.4×	248 0.6×	59 0.5×	101 1.1×	26 0.3×	41	422
Charas Y. T. Ong United Kingdom	15	740 1.5×	471 1.2×	155 1.4×	166 1.8×	11 0.1×	23	902
Kara B. Markham United States	8	318 0.7×	312 0.8×	23 0.2×	74 0.8×	52 0.7×	28	511

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Stenhouse

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Stenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Stenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Stenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Stenhouse

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Stenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Stenhouse. The network helps show where Emily Stenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Stenhouse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Stenhouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Stenhouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Stenhouse. Emily Stenhouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Jones, Jeremy, et al.. (2020). Determination of thyroid volume in infants with suspected congenital hypothyroidism—the limitations of both subjective and objective evaluation. BJR|Open. 2(1). 20200001–20200001. 2 indexed citations

2.

Patel, Neil, et al.. (2018). Early Postnatal Ventricular Dysfunction Is Associated with Disease Severity in Patients with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. The Journal of Pediatrics. 203. 400–407.e1. 66 indexed citations

3.

Garrick, Vikki, Emily Stenhouse, Graham Haddock, & Richard K. Russell. (2012). A multidisciplinary team model of caring for patients with perianal Crohn's disease incorporating a literature review, topical therapy and personal practice. Frontline Gastroenterology. 4(2). 152–160. 2 indexed citations

4.

Stenhouse, Emily, et al.. (2004). First‐trimester combined ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down syndrome in routine clinical practice. Prenatal Diagnosis. 24(10). 774–780. 40 indexed citations

5.

Smith, Gordon C. S., Emily Stenhouse, Jennifer A. Crossley, et al.. (2002). Early-pregnancy origins of low birth weight. Nature. 417(6892). 916–916. 102 indexed citations

6.

Stenhouse, Emily, et al.. (2002). Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: how accurate are we?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 19(4). 350–352. 63 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Gordon C. S., Emily Stenhouse, Jennifer A. Crossley, et al.. (2002). Early Pregnancy Levels of Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A and the Risk of Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Premature Birth, Preeclampsia, and Stillbirth. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 87(4). 1762–1767. 379 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact