Emily St. John

580 total citations
7 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

Emily St. John is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily St. John has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Emily St. John's work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (4 papers). Emily St. John is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (4 papers). Emily St. John collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and New Zealand. Emily St. John's co-authors include Anna‐Louise Reysenbach, Zhichao Zhou, Karthik Anantharaman, Mircea Podar, Gilberto E. Flores, Zhiqiang Chen, Kevin Mitchell, Kirill Lagutin, Matthew B. Stott and Yitai Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY and Microbiome.

In The Last Decade

Emily St. John

6 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily St. John United States	5	128	111	60	17	14	7	175
Kyle Metcalfe United States	7	69 0.5×	81 0.7×	57 0.9×	12 0.7×	23 1.6×	11	179
Lauren Seyler United States	6	131 1.0×	71 0.6×	77 1.3×	24 1.4×	8 0.6×	9	163
Bernhard Viehweger Germany	3	95 0.7×	83 0.7×	45 0.8×	19 1.1×	10 0.7×	4	165
Anthony Nitti United States	5	144 1.1×	114 1.0×	43 0.7×	22 1.3×	27 1.9×	7	251
Young C. Song Canada	6	111 0.9×	108 1.0×	26 0.4×	37 2.2×	4 0.3×	7	177
Robin R. Rohwer United States	7	141 1.1×	83 0.7×	43 0.7×	23 1.4×	4 0.3×	10	181
Marco Taborda Portugal	8	194 1.5×	208 1.9×	50 0.8×	10 0.6×	8 0.6×	9	272
Katherine R. Lane United States	2	109 0.9×	85 0.8×	28 0.5×	5 0.3×	12 0.9×	2	174
Adriana Rego Portugal	7	88 0.7×	73 0.7×	20 0.3×	22 1.3×	7 0.5×	11	180
R.T. Kevorkian United States	6	142 1.1×	63 0.6×	109 1.8×	20 1.2×	8 0.6×	14	178

Countries citing papers authored by Emily St. John

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily St. John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily St. John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily St. John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily St. John

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily St. John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily St. John. The network helps show where Emily St. John may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily St. John

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily St. John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily St. John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily St. John. Emily St. John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

John, Emily St., et al.. (2024). Genomic comparison of deep-sea hydrothermal genera related to Aeropyrum, Thermodiscus and Caldisphaera, and proposed emended description of the family Acidilobaceae. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 47(2-3). 126507–126507. 4 indexed citations

L’Haridon, Stéphane, et al.. (2023). Methanocaldococcus lauensis sp. nov., a novel deep-sea hydrothermal vent hyperthermophilic methanogen. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. 73(1).

Zhou, Zhichao, Emily St. John, Karthik Anantharaman, & Anna‐Louise Reysenbach. (2022). Global patterns of diversity and metabolism of microbial communities in deep-sea hydrothermal vent deposits. Microbiome. 10(1). 241–241. 47 indexed citations

Reysenbach, Anna‐Louise, Emily St. John, Gilberto E. Flores, et al.. (2020). Complex subsurface hydrothermal fluid mixing at a submarine arc volcano supports distinct and highly diverse microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(51). 32627–32638. 42 indexed citations

L’Haridon, Stéphane, et al.. (2019). Marinitoga lauensis sp. nov., a novel deep-sea hydrothermal vent thermophilic anaerobic heterotroph with a prophage. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 42(3). 343–347. 11 indexed citations

John, Emily St., et al.. (2019). Deep‐sea hydrothermal vent metagenome‐assembled genomes provide insight into the phylum Nanoarchaeota. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 11(2). 262–270. 17 indexed citations

John, Emily St., Yitai Liu, Mircea Podar, et al.. (2018). A new symbiotic nanoarchaeote (Candidatus Nanoclepta minutus) and its host (Zestosphaera tikiterensis gen. nov., sp. nov.) from a New Zealand hot spring. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 42(1). 94–106. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact