Emily Seto

4.8k citations
99 papers · 3.0k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 29

Emily Seto

95 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth ap...238201420262018202250100150200

Peers

Emily Seto
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Family Practice 248
  • Applied Psychology 430
  • General Health Professions 1.3k
  • Health Information Management 132
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 587
Replace Wenru Wang with:
Wenru Wang Singapore
Joseph A Cafazzo Canada
Mary Ann Sevick United States
Suzanne Austin Boren United States
David Peiris Australia
R. Sacha Bhatia Canada
Thomas S. Nesbitt United States
Ruth Masterson Creber United States
Anthony Jerant United States
Jesse Jansen Australia
Emily Seto relative to Wenru Wang Singapore Wenru Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Wenru Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Seto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Seto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Seto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Seto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Seto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Seto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Seto. The network helps show where Emily Seto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Seto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Seto Line = papers co-authored together Emily Seto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202311
2 20236
3 20231
4 20237
5 20234
6 20235
7 20227
8 202240
9 20221
10 20227
11 20218
12 202119
13 202113
14 202113
15 202127
16 20211
17 201712
18 201628
19 201618
20 2012253

About Emily Seto

Emily Seto is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (33 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (19 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (16 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (12 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (248 citations), Applied Psychology (430 citations), General Health Professions (1.3k citations), Health Information Management (132 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (587 citations). Emily Seto has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Joseph A Cafazzo, Heather J. Ross, Kevin J. Leonard, Caterina Masino, Jan Barnsley, Aaron S. Miller, Patrick Ware, Jennifer Stinson, Bonnie Stevens and Paul C. Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Digital Health, BMJ Open and Canadian Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026