Emily Payne

909 total citations
23 papers, 749 citations indexed

About

Emily Payne is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Payne has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 749 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Environmental Engineering, 9 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Emily Payne's work include Urban Stormwater Management Solutions (14 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (7 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (5 papers). Emily Payne is often cited by papers focused on Urban Stormwater Management Solutions (14 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (7 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (5 papers). Emily Payne collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Iraq. Emily Payne's co-authors include Ana Deletić, Belinda E. Hatt, Tim D. Fletcher, Perran L. M. Cook, David McCarthy, Kefeng Zhang, Timothy R. Cavagnaro, Douglas G. Russell, Victor Evrard and Michael Grace and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and Water Research.

In The Last Decade

Emily Payne

22 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Payne Australia 12 575 286 270 122 110 23 749
Yaron Zinger Australia 12 969 1.7× 430 1.5× 437 1.6× 141 1.2× 123 1.1× 15 1.1k
Liqing Li China 13 430 0.7× 211 0.7× 194 0.7× 204 1.7× 140 1.3× 37 706
Andrew J. Erickson United States 14 415 0.7× 233 0.8× 133 0.5× 152 1.2× 78 0.7× 31 670
Mary G. Lusk United States 13 339 0.6× 171 0.6× 135 0.5× 224 1.8× 118 1.1× 50 774
Bert van Duin Canada 15 556 1.0× 80 0.3× 315 1.2× 125 1.0× 66 0.6× 40 684
Houng Li United States 8 859 1.5× 189 0.7× 460 1.7× 152 1.2× 154 1.4× 10 934
Yufen Ren China 15 301 0.5× 82 0.3× 209 0.8× 168 1.4× 108 1.0× 35 643
J. T. Smith United States 7 811 1.4× 156 0.5× 498 1.8× 185 1.5× 96 0.9× 13 893
R. Andrew Tirpak United States 14 408 0.7× 103 0.4× 217 0.8× 116 1.0× 89 0.8× 30 523
Alar Teemusk Estonia 15 531 0.9× 79 0.3× 261 1.0× 46 0.4× 59 0.5× 20 843

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Payne. The network helps show where Emily Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Payne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Payne. Emily Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Payne, Emily & Astrid Layton. (2024). Integrating Machine Learning Into the Design of Green Building Systems. 1 indexed citations
2.
Huang, Hao, Emily Payne, Shamina Hossain‐McKenzie, et al.. (2024). A graph embedding‐based approach for automatic cyber‐physical power system risk assessment to prevent and mitigate threats at scale. IET Cyber-Physical Systems Theory & Applications. 9(4). 435–453. 2 indexed citations
4.
Fowdar, Harsha, Emily Payne, Christelle Schang, et al.. (2021). How well do stormwater green infrastructure respond to changing climatic conditions?. Journal of Hydrology. 603. 126887–126887. 34 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Kefeng, Yizhou Liu, Ana Deletić, et al.. (2020). The impact of stormwater biofilter design and operational variables on nutrient removal - a statistical modelling approach. Water Research. 188. 116486–116486. 41 indexed citations
7.
Rogers, Briony, Diego Ramírez-Lovering, Hadi Susilo Arifin, et al.. (2019). Leapfrogging pathways for a water sensitive Bogor. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hatt, Belinda E., et al.. (2018). Accumulation of heavy metals in stormwater bioretention media: A field study of temporal and spatial variation. Journal of Hydrology. 567. 721–731. 60 indexed citations
9.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2018). Which species? A decision-support tool to guide plant selection in stormwater biofilters. Advances in Water Resources. 113. 86–99. 82 indexed citations
10.
Deletić, Ana, Harsha Fowdar, Veljko Prodanović, et al.. (2018). Integrated multi-functional urban water systems: key findings from project C4.1. 1 indexed citations
11.
Winfrey, Brandon K., Emily Payne, & Richard F. Ambrose. (2018). Understanding the Roles of Biodiversity and Functional Diversity in Provision of Co-Benefits by Stormwater Biofilter Plant Communities. 203–212. 4 indexed citations
12.
Payne, Emily, Rebekah Henry, Belinda E. Hatt, et al.. (2018). Plant-Microbe Interactions Drive Denitrification Rates, Dissolved Nitrogen Removal, and the Abundance of Denitrification Genes in Stormwater Control Measures. Environmental Science & Technology. 52(16). 9320–9329. 68 indexed citations
13.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2017). Inside Story of Gas Processes within Stormwater Biofilters: Does Greenhouse Gas Production Tarnish the Benefits of Nitrogen Removal?. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(7). 3703–3713. 15 indexed citations
14.
Payne, Emily, Tim D. Fletcher, Douglas G. Russell, et al.. (2014). Temporary Storage or Permanent Removal? The Division of Nitrogen between Biotic Assimilation and Denitrification in Stormwater Biofiltration Systems. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e90890–e90890. 99 indexed citations
15.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2014). E. coli removal in laboratory scale stormwater biofilters: Influence of vegetation and submerged zone. Journal of Hydrology. 519. 814–822. 75 indexed citations
16.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2014). Biofilter design for effective nitrogen removal from stormwater – influence of plant species, inflow hydrology and use of a saturated zone. Water Science & Technology. 69(6). 1312–1319. 99 indexed citations
17.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2013). Stormwater biofiltration-the challenges of inorganic and organic nitrogen removal. 153–160. 3 indexed citations
18.
Payne, Emily, Tim D. Fletcher, Perran L. M. Cook, Ana Deletić, & Belinda E. Hatt. (2013). Processes and Drivers of Nitrogen Removal in Stormwater Biofiltration. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 44(7). 796–846. 92 indexed citations
19.
Payne, Emily, et al.. (2012). The influence of vegetation in stormwater biofilters on infiltration and nitrogen removal: Preliminary findings. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 145–153. 7 indexed citations
20.
Costelloe, Justin F., et al.. (2008). Water sources accessed by arid zone riparian trees in highly saline environments, Australia. Oecologia. 156(1). 43–52. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026