Emily Mower

4.9k citations
21 papers · 3.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Emily Mower

21 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

IEMOCAP: interactive emotional dyadic motion capture data...2.2k200820262014202050010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Emily Mower
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.4k
  • Signal Processing 1.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.8k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 577
  • Pharmacy 141
Replace Abe Kazemzadeh with:
Abe Kazemzadeh United States
Murtaza Bulut United States
Samuel Kim United States
Fabien Ringeval United Kingdom
Laurence Devillers France
Chul Min Lee South Korea
Winfried A. Fellenz United Kingdom
G. Votsis Greece
Walter F. Sendlmeier Germany
Serdar Yıldırım Türkiye
Emily Mower relative to Abe Kazemzadeh United States Abe Kazemzadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Abe Kazemzadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Mower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Mower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Mower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Mower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Mower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Mower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Mower. The network helps show where Emily Mower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Mower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Mower Line = papers co-authored together Emily Mower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Recognition of Physiological Data for a Motivational Agent
20111
2 201123
3 201148
4 201111
5 2011243
6 2010157
7 201038
8 20107
9 20103
10 20101
11 200948
12 200990
13 20096
14
Development of Socially Assistive Robots For Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
200910
15 200948
16
IEMOCAP: interactive emotional dyadic motion capture databasebreakdown →
20082204
17 20089
18 20086
19 2007219
20 200732

About Emily Mower

Emily Mower is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotion and Mood Recognition (15 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.4k citations), Signal Processing (1.5k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (1.8k citations). Emily Mower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Shrikanth Narayanan, Sungbok Lee, Chi-Chun Lee, Carlos Busso, Abe Kazemzadeh, Samuel Kim, Murtaza Bulut, Maja J. Matarić, Kristian Kroschel and Michael Grimm. Their work appears in journals such as Speech Communication, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Language Resources and Evaluation, AI Magazine and IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026