Emily Mevers

1.6k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 17
    • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 3
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 3

Emily Mevers

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emily Mevers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Biotechnology 298
  • Pharmacology 402
  • Spectroscopy 153
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 142
  • Organic Chemistry 247
Replace Evgenia Glukhov with:
Evgenia Glukhov United States
Aleksej Krunić United States
Gilles H. Goetz United States
Albán R. Pereira United States
Tim A. Smitka United States
Brandon I. Morinaka Switzerland
Ling Ding China
José A. Gavín Spain
Si Zhang China
Ryan M. Van Wagoner United States
Emily Mevers relative to Evgenia Glukhov United States Evgenia Glukhov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Evgenia Glukhov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Mevers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Mevers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Mevers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Mevers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Mevers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Mevers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Mevers. The network helps show where Emily Mevers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Mevers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Mevers Line = papers co-authored together Emily Mevers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010196
2 2017131
3 201694
4 201882
5 201180
6 201266
7 201958
8 201830
9 201930
10 202130
11 201729
12 201828
13 201224
14 201323
15 201822
16 201822
17 201819
18 201619
19 201419
20 202116

About Emily Mevers

Emily Mevers is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry and Insect Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (17 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (11 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (4 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (298 citations), Pharmacology (402 citations), Spectroscopy (153 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (142 citations) and Organic Chemistry (247 citations). Emily Mevers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and China. Frequent co-authors include William H. Gerwick, Jon Clardy, Joshawna K. Nunnery, Tara Byrum, Josep Saurí, Gary E. Martin, Yizhou Liu, R. Thomas Williamson, Mark W. Peczuh and Henk Hiemstra. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organic Letters, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact