Emily Marks

17 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Emily Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
  • Health 78
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Oncology 85
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 15
Replace Moosa Sajjadi with:
Moosa Sajjadi Iran
Wubin Xie United States
Ingela Beck Sweden
Priscilla Novak United States
Nathan A. Boucher United States
Lena J. Lee United States
Julia Menichetti Norway
Sharon J. Reeder United States
Xiujing Guo China
Angela Sun United States
Emily Marks relative to Moosa Sajjadi Iran Moosa Sajjadi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Moosa Sajjadi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Marks. The network helps show where Emily Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Marks Line = papers co-authored together Emily Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2013124
2 201588
3 201864
4 201547
5 201637
6 201523
7 201621
8 201618
9 201817
10 201515
11 201614
12 201610
13 201610
14 20216
15 20192
16 20161
17 19911
18 20250

About Emily Marks

Emily Marks is a scholar working on Oncology, Pharmacology, Health, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), HIV-related health complications and treatments (1 paper) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Health (78 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Oncology (85 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (15 citations). Emily Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Simon J. Craddock Lee, Robin T. Higashi, Jamie S. Ostroff, David E. Gerber, Joan H. Schiller, Heidi Hamann, Liana Fraenkel, Thomas M. Gill, M. Carrington Reid and Una E. Makris. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Patient Education and Counseling, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, General Hospital Psychiatry and Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact