Emily L. Weiser

1.5k total citations
41 papers, 681 citations indexed

About

Emily L. Weiser is a scholar working on Ecology, Oncology and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily L. Weiser has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 681 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Ecology, 13 papers in Oncology and 12 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Emily L. Weiser's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers). Emily L. Weiser is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers). Emily L. Weiser collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Emily L. Weiser's co-authors include Abby N. Powell, Ian G. Jamieson, Catherine E. Grueber, Paul J. Limburg, Philip D. Parks, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Xuan Zhu, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Joan M. Griffin and Jay E. Diffendorfer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Emily L. Weiser

40 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Emily L. Weiser
David McLeod United Kingdom
Molly E. Church United States
Seth A. Moore United States
Michael T. Henderson United States
Katherine A. Allen United Kingdom
Jeffrey S. Marks United States
David McLeod United Kingdom
Emily L. Weiser
Citations per year, relative to Emily L. Weiser Emily L. Weiser (= 1×) peers David McLeod

Countries citing papers authored by Emily L. Weiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily L. Weiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily L. Weiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily L. Weiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily L. Weiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily L. Weiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily L. Weiser. The network helps show where Emily L. Weiser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily L. Weiser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily L. Weiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily L. Weiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily L. Weiser. Emily L. Weiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weiser, Emily L., James A. Johnson, Steven M. Matsuoka, & Colleen M. Handel. (2025). Accounting for seasonal patterns in bird availability prevents biased population trend estimates with advancing spring phenology. Ornithological applications. 127(4). 1–11.
2.
Weiser, Emily L., Cory T. Overton, David C. Douglas, Michael L. Casazza, & Paul L. Flint. (2024). Geese migrating over the Pacific Ocean select altitudes coinciding with offshore wind turbine blades. Journal of Applied Ecology. 61(5). 951–962. 3 indexed citations
3.
Parker, Kevin A., John G. Ewen, John Innes, et al.. (2023). Conservation translocations of fauna in Aotearoa New Zealand: a review. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 3 indexed citations
4.
Weiser, Emily L., et al.. (2022). Optimizing surveys of fall‐staging geese using aerial imagery and automated counting. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 47(1). 2 indexed citations
5.
Zhu, Xuan, Emily L. Weiser, Joan M. Griffin, Paul J. Limburg, & Lila J. Finney Rutten. (2022). Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decision-making among average-risk US adults. Preventive Medicine Reports. 30. 102047–102047. 8 indexed citations
6.
Weiser, Emily L.. (2021). Fully accounting for nest age reduces bias when quantifying nest survival. Ornithological applications. 123(3). 13 indexed citations
7.
Weiser, Emily L., Jay E. Diffendorfer, Laura López‐Hoffman, Darius J. Semmens, & Wayne E. Thogmartin. (2021). TrendPowerTool : A lookup tool for estimating the statistical power of a monitoring program to detect population trends. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(7). 1 indexed citations
8.
Zhu, Xuan, Emily L. Weiser, Debra J. Jacobson, et al.. (2021). Patient preferences on general health and colorectal cancer screening decision-making: Results from a national survey. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(4). 1034–1040. 8 indexed citations
9.
Zhu, Xuan, Philip D. Parks, Emily L. Weiser, et al.. (2021). Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options – Data from a national survey. Preventive Medicine Reports. 24. 101508–101508. 25 indexed citations
10.
Zhu, Xuan, Philip D. Parks, Emily L. Weiser, et al.. (2021). National Survey of Patient Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences. Cancer Prevention Research. 14(5). 603–614. 35 indexed citations
11.
Weiser, Emily L.. (2020). Sample-size considerations for a study of shorebird nest survival in the 1002 Area, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 2 indexed citations
12.
Seier, Kenneth, Mithat Gönen, Patrick J. McCormick, et al.. (2020). Invasive central venous monitoring during hepatic resection: unnecessary for most patients. HPB. 22(12). 1732–1737. 3 indexed citations
13.
Rutten, Lila J. Finney, Debra J. Jacobson, Gregory D. Jenkins, et al.. (2020). Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality. Preventive Medicine Reports. 20. 101202–101202. 14 indexed citations
14.
Weiser, Emily L., Jay E. Diffendorfer, Ralph Grundel, et al.. (2019). Balancing sampling intensity against spatial coverage for a community science monitoring programme. Journal of Applied Ecology. 56(10). 2252–2263. 18 indexed citations
15.
Kwon, Eunbi, Emily L. Weiser, Richard B. Lanctot, et al.. (2019). Geographic variation in the intensity of warming and phenological mismatch between Arctic shorebirds and invertebrates. Ecological Monographs. 89(4). 50 indexed citations
16.
Holt, Holly L., John Ward, Kristen A. Baum, et al.. (2019). The Integrated Monarch Monitoring Program: From Design to Implementation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7. 24 indexed citations
17.
Erickson, Richard A., et al.. (2018). Wrangling distributed computing for high-throughput environmental science: An introduction to HTCondor. PLoS Computational Biology. 14(10). e1006468–e1006468. 16 indexed citations
18.
Weiser, Emily L., Jay E. Diffendorfer, Laura López‐Hoffman, Darius J. Semmens, & Wayne E. Thogmartin. (2018). Consequences of ignoring spatial variation in population trend when conducting a power analysis. Ecography. 42(4). 836–844. 9 indexed citations
19.
Kwon, Eunbi, Willow B. English, Emily L. Weiser, et al.. (2017). Delayed egg‐laying and shortened incubation duration of Arctic‐breeding shorebirds coincide with climate cooling. Ecology and Evolution. 8(2). 1339–1351. 20 indexed citations
20.
Weiser, Emily L. & Abby N. Powell. (2011). Reduction of Garbage in the Diet of Nonbreeding Glaucous Gulls Corresponding to a Change in Waste Management. ARCTIC. 64(2). 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026