Emily Jost

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 548 citations indexed

About

Emily Jost is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Jost has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 548 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 9 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Emily Jost's work include Diabetes Management and Research (13 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (9 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (5 papers). Emily Jost is often cited by papers focused on Diabetes Management and Research (13 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (9 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (5 papers). Emily Jost collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Emily Jost's co-authors include Gregory P. Forlenza, R. Paul Wadwa, Bruce A. Buckingham, Roy W. Beck, Laya Ekhlaspour, Stuart A. Weinzimer, Lori Carria, Craig Kollman, Eda Cengiz and Melissa J. Schoelwer and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Diabetes Care and Diabetes.

In The Last Decade

Emily Jost

12 papers receiving 526 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

2020 284 citations Marc D. Breton, Lauren Kanapka et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Jost United States	7	510	412	356	21	13	13	548
Liana Hsu United States	11	567 1.1×	448 1.1×	370 1.0×	18 0.9×	27 2.1×	18	612
Sara Charleer Belgium	10	655 1.3×	399 1.0×	418 1.2×	25 1.2×	22 1.7×	21	693
Ingrid Schütz-Fuhrmann Austria	7	507 1.0×	377 0.9×	325 0.9×	14 0.7×	26 2.0×	15	568
Yongjin Xu United States	11	442 0.9×	247 0.6×	272 0.8×	14 0.7×	30 2.3×	26	470
Kevin B. Kaiserman United States	11	426 0.8×	330 0.8×	299 0.8×	16 0.8×	9 0.7×	22	504
Jonathan Burdick United States	6	372 0.7×	289 0.7×	240 0.7×	5 0.2×	14 1.1×	8	418
Katherine Bergamo United States	2	250 0.5×	155 0.4×	171 0.5×	7 0.3×	24 1.8×	3	270
Emily Eyth United States	3	223 0.4×	151 0.4×	153 0.4×	9 0.4×	9 0.7×	3	242
Thomas J. Mouse United States	2	252 0.5×	155 0.4×	174 0.5×	7 0.3×	24 1.8×	3	271
G Faber-Heinemann Germany	4	378 0.7×	241 0.6×	248 0.7×	11 0.5×	16 1.2×	5	409

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Jost

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Jost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Jost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Jost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Jost

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Jost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Jost. The network helps show where Emily Jost may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Jost

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Jost. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Jost based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Jost. Emily Jost is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Cobry, Erin, Mark D. DeBoer, Melissa J. Schoelwer, et al.. (2025). Algorithm-Driven Initiation and Adaptation of Hybrid Closed-Loop in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.. PubMed. 27(8). 587–596. 2 indexed citations

Jost, Emily, Laurel H. Messer, Paul Cook, et al.. (2024). “Obviously, Nothing's Gonna Happen in Five Minutes”: How Adolescents and Young Adults Infrastructure Resources to Learn Type 1 Diabetes Management. PubMed. 2024. 1–16. 1 indexed citations

Cobry, Erin, Laura Pyle, Lisa J. Meltzer, et al.. (2024). Impact of 6-months of an advanced hybrid closed-loop system on sleep and psychosocial outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes and their parents. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 207. 111087–111087. 11 indexed citations

Pyle, Laura, Gregory P. Forlenza, Lindsey Towers, et al.. (2024). Accuracy of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitor in Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 26(9). 626–632. 5 indexed citations

Cobry, Erin, Laura Pyle, Gregory P. Forlenza, et al.. (2024). Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor During Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Inpatient Admissions. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 26(2). 119–124. 8 indexed citations

Jost, Emily, et al.. (2024). 967-P: The Use of Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adolescents and Young Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia during Induction Chemotherapy. Diabetes. 73(Supplement_1).

Breton, Marc D., Lauren Kanapka, Roy W. Beck, et al.. (2020). A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 383(9). 836–845. 284 indexed citations breakdown →

Kanapka, Lauren, R. Paul Wadwa, Marc D. Breton, et al.. (2020). Extended Use of the Control-IQ Closed-Loop Control System in Children With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 44(2). 473–478. 29 indexed citations

Forlenza, Gregory P., Zoey Li, Bruce A. Buckingham, et al.. (2018). Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Reduces Hypoglycemia in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in an At-Home Randomized Crossover Study: Results of the PROLOG Trial. Diabetes Care. 41(10). 2155–2161. 168 indexed citations

10.

Pinsker, Jordan E., Zoey Li, Bruce A. Buckingham, et al.. (2018). Exceptional Usability of Tandem t:slim X2 with Basal-IQ Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend (PLGS)—The PROLOG Study. Diabetes. 67(Supplement_1). 4 indexed citations

11.

Spaic, Tamara, Marsha Driscoll, Dan Raghinaru, et al.. (2017). Predictive Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia Minimization: In-Home Evaluation of Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy in Overnight Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 40(3). 359–366. 17 indexed citations

12.

Jost, Emily, Cari Berget, Emily Westfall, et al.. (2017). 010–Automated Insulin Delivery (Artificial Pancreas) on the Horizon: Educational Considerations for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 34. 104–105. 2 indexed citations

13.

Forlenza, Gregory P., Dan Raghinaru, Faye Cameron, et al.. (2017). Predictive hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia minimization: In‐home double‐blind randomized controlled evaluation in children and young adolescents. Pediatric Diabetes. 19(3). 420–428. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact