Emily Finch

4.6k total citations
108 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Emily Finch is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Finch has authored 108 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Epidemiology, 30 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 26 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily Finch's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (23 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (16 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (15 papers). Emily Finch is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (23 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (16 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (15 papers). Emily Finch collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Emily Finch's co-authors include Robert W. Jeffery, Ronald T. Ackermann, John Strang, Jennifer A. Linde, David G. Marrero, Edward J. Brizendine, Haiyu Zhou, Alexander J. Rothman, John Marsden and Laura Ichikawa and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Diabetes Care and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Emily Finch

101 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Finch United Kingdom 32 1.0k 849 784 735 513 108 3.2k
Laurie Ruggiero United States 31 844 0.8× 723 0.9× 947 1.2× 1.2k 1.7× 396 0.8× 83 4.2k
Michael Vallis Canada 34 548 0.5× 805 0.9× 777 1.0× 1.3k 1.7× 558 1.1× 137 4.4k
Pilvikki Absetz Finland 32 853 0.9× 470 0.6× 985 1.3× 306 0.4× 471 0.9× 118 3.2k
Robert L. Newton United States 33 1.9k 1.9× 269 0.3× 952 1.2× 500 0.7× 352 0.7× 119 3.7k
Alan M. Delamater United States 43 1.1k 1.1× 567 0.7× 1.2k 1.5× 984 1.3× 225 0.4× 186 6.1k
Rebecca A. Krukowski United States 30 1.4k 1.4× 184 0.2× 1.2k 1.6× 1.1k 1.4× 379 0.7× 158 3.3k
Ann Varady United States 31 1.8k 1.8× 174 0.2× 814 1.0× 998 1.4× 422 0.8× 44 3.7k
Joanna Buscemi United States 26 986 1.0× 277 0.3× 781 1.0× 498 0.7× 162 0.3× 112 2.3k
Nathalie Huguet United States 33 695 0.7× 562 0.7× 1.2k 1.5× 1.4k 1.9× 128 0.2× 142 3.7k
Gillian Tober United Kingdom 15 535 0.5× 1.1k 1.3× 1.4k 1.8× 1.1k 1.5× 103 0.2× 43 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Finch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Finch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Finch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Finch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Finch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Finch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Finch. The network helps show where Emily Finch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Finch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Finch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Finch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Finch. Emily Finch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hastings, Richard P., et al.. (2025). Digital Psychological Wellbeing Interventions for Family Carers of Children and Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 38(4). e70081–e70081. 1 indexed citations
2.
Finch, Emily. (2024). The Criminalisation of Stalking.
3.
Norrie, Caroline, Liz Riley, James Shearer, et al.. (2023). Gambling Harms in Adult Social Care: Developing an ‘Introductory’ Question to Identify Gambling Harms Among Service Users. The British Journal of Social Work. 53(8). 3584–3607. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pearson, Rachel, Amelia Jewell, Linda Wijlaars, et al.. (2021). Linking data on women in public family law court proceedings concerning their children to mental health service records in South London. International Journal for Population Data Science. 6(1). 5 indexed citations
5.
Kimergård, Andreas, Zarnie Khadjesari, Simon Coulton, et al.. (2020). Assertive outreach treatment versus care as usual for the treatment of high-need, high-cost alcohol related frequent attenders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 20(1). 332–332. 5 indexed citations
6.
Metrebian, Nicola, Tim Weaver, Stephen Pilling, et al.. (2019). Telephone delivered incentives for encouraging adherence to supervised methadone consumption (TIES): Study protocol for a feasibility study for an RCT of clinical and cost effectiveness. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 17. 100506–100506. 5 indexed citations
8.
Weaver, Tim, Nicola Metrebian, Jennifer Hellier, et al.. (2014). Use of contingency management incentives to improve completion of hepatitis B vaccination in people undergoing treatment for heroin dependence: a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet. 384(9938). 153–163. 76 indexed citations
9.
Linde, Jennifer A., Gregory E. Simon, Evette Ludman, et al.. (2010). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment Versus Combined Weight Loss/Depression Treatment Among Women with Comorbid Obesity and Depression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 41(1). 119–130. 79 indexed citations
10.
Ludman, Evette, Gregory E. Simon, Laura Ichikawa, et al.. (2009). Does Depression Reduce the Effectiveness of Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment?. Behavioral Medicine. 35(4). 126–134. 21 indexed citations
11.
Jeffery, Robert W., et al.. (2006). A Satisfaction Enhancement Intervention for Long‐Term Weight Loss. Obesity. 14(5). 863–869. 17 indexed citations
12.
Finch, Emily & Vanessa E. Munro. (2005). Of Bodies, Boundaries and Borders: Intoxicated Sexual Consent under the Law of Scotland and England. Research Portal (King's College London). 2005(1). 53–73. 1 indexed citations
13.
Finch, Emily & Vanessa E. Munro. (2004). The Sexual Offences Act 2003: (5) Intoxicated Consent and Drug Assisted Rape Revisited. Research Portal (King's College London). 789–802. 13 indexed citations
14.
Finch, Emily & Vanessa E. Munro. (2003). Intoxicated consent and the boundaries of drug-assisted rape. Research Portal (King's College London). 773–787. 4 indexed citations
15.
Best, David, J. Alison Noble, Michael Gossop, et al.. (2002). Identifying Alcohol Problems Among Methadone Maintenance Patients. 2(1-2). 87–101.
16.
Finch, Emily. (2001). Issues of confidentiality in research into criminal activity: the legal and ethical dilemma. 5 indexed citations
17.
Best, David, Jenny Harris, Michael Gossop, et al.. (2000). Use of non‐prescribed methadone and other illicit drugs during methadone maintenance treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review. 19(1). 9–16. 37 indexed citations
18.
Finch, Emily, et al.. (1995). A Low Threshold Methadone Stabilisation Programme–Description and First Stage Evaluation. Addiction Research. 3(1). 63–71. 13 indexed citations
19.
Finch, Emily, et al.. (1994). PATIENTS PREFERENCES AND RANDOMIZED TRIALS. The Lancet. 344(8923). 688–689. 16 indexed citations
20.
Barer, David, Emily Finch, Michael Gossop, et al.. (1994). Patients' preferences and randomised trials. The Lancet. 344(8923). 688–689. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026