Emily E. Brink

2.0k total citations
25 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Emily E. Brink is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily E. Brink has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Emily E. Brink's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers). Emily E. Brink is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers). Emily E. Brink collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Emily E. Brink's co-authors include R. Mackel, Donald W. Pfaff, Victor J. Wilson, E. Jankowska, Bengt Skoog, David A. McCrea, Kohnosuke Jinnai, Paul J. Harrison, Ichirō Suzuki and Naoki Hirai and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Emily E. Brink

25 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily E. Brink United States 15 442 377 266 197 162 25 1.1k
R. Mackel United States 18 557 1.3× 503 1.3× 336 1.3× 303 1.5× 290 1.8× 31 1.3k
M. Kato Japan 20 273 0.6× 323 0.9× 147 0.6× 416 2.1× 113 0.7× 46 1.1k
S. Mori Japan 19 325 0.7× 470 1.2× 165 0.6× 262 1.3× 212 1.3× 42 1.3k
P. K. Rose United Kingdom 11 536 1.2× 247 0.7× 90 0.3× 150 0.8× 118 0.7× 11 1.0k
G. Horcholle‐Bossavit France 19 439 1.0× 341 0.9× 72 0.3× 244 1.2× 173 1.1× 66 929
Ingmar Ros�n Sweden 17 385 0.9× 629 1.7× 134 0.5× 565 2.9× 203 1.3× 23 1.3k
Y. Padel France 19 467 1.1× 650 1.7× 118 0.4× 543 2.8× 329 2.0× 29 1.3k
Muriel McGlamery 7 312 0.7× 381 1.0× 109 0.4× 168 0.9× 278 1.7× 13 985
Joe Dan Coulter United States 18 654 1.5× 537 1.4× 150 0.6× 295 1.5× 96 0.6× 21 1.6k
Kwabena Appenteng United Kingdom 21 558 1.3× 496 1.3× 131 0.5× 209 1.1× 250 1.5× 39 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Brink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Brink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Brink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Brink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Brink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Brink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Brink. The network helps show where Emily E. Brink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily E. Brink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily E. Brink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily E. Brink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily E. Brink. Emily E. Brink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mackel, R. & Emily E. Brink. (2003). Conduction of neural impulses in diabetic neuropathy. Clinical Neurophysiology. 114(2). 248–255. 20 indexed citations
2.
Mackel, R. & Emily E. Brink. (1995). Accommodation in single human nerve fibers in vivo. Muscle & Nerve. 18(4). 469–471. 2 indexed citations
3.
Mackel, R., Emily E. Brink, Ellen Jørum, & Mindy Aisen. (1994). Properties of cutaneous afferents during recovery from Guillain—Barré syndrome. Brain. 117(1). 169–183. 7 indexed citations
4.
Brink, Emily E. & R. Mackel. (1993). Time course of action potentials recorded from single human afferents. Brain. 116(2). 415–432. 23 indexed citations
5.
Brink, Emily E. & R. Mackel. (1993). Electrophysiology of dopamine-denervated striatal neurons. Brain. 116(2). 433–452. 268 indexed citations
6.
Mackel, R., et al.. (1992). Spinal input to thalamic VL neurons: evidence for direct spinothalamic effects. Journal of Neurophysiology. 67(1). 132–144. 13 indexed citations
7.
Yates, Bill J., J. Kasper, Emily E. Brink, & Victor J. Wilson. (1988). Peripheral input to L4 neurons whose activity is modulated by neck rotation. Brain Research. 449(1-2). 377–380. 4 indexed citations
8.
Brink, Emily E. & R. Mackel. (1987). Sensorimotor performance of the hand during peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 77(2-3). 249–266. 36 indexed citations
9.
Mackel, R., et al.. (1985). Properties of cutaneous mechanosensitive afferents during the early stages of regeneration in man. Brain Research. 329(1-2). 49–69. 24 indexed citations
10.
Brink, Emily E., Ichirō Suzuki, S. J. Timerick, & Victor J. Wilson. (1985). Tonic neck reflex of the decerebrate cat: a role for propriospinal neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 54(4). 978–987. 45 indexed citations
11.
Brink, Emily E., Ichirō Suzuki, S. J. Timerick, & Victor J. Wilson. (1984). Directional sensitivity of neurons in the lumbar spinal cord to neck rotation. Brain Research. 323(1). 172–175. 9 indexed citations
12.
Brink, Emily E., E. Jankowska, David A. McCrea, & Bengt Skoog. (1983). Inhibitory interactions between interneurones in reflex pathways from group Ia and group Ib afferents in the cat.. The Journal of Physiology. 343(1). 361–373. 120 indexed citations
13.
Brink, Emily E., Paul J. Harrison, E. Jankowska, David A. McCrea, & Bengt Skoog. (1983). Post‐synaptic potentials in a population of motoneurones following activity of single interneurones in the cat.. The Journal of Physiology. 343(1). 341–359. 110 indexed citations
14.
Brink, Emily E., E. Jankowska, David A. McCrea, & Bengt Skoog. (1981). Use of sucrose gap for recording postsynaptic population potentials evoked by single interneurones in spinal motoneurones. Brain Research. 223(1). 165–169. 10 indexed citations
15.
Brink, Emily E. & Donald W. Pfaff. (1981). Supraspinal and segmental input to lumbar epaxial motoneurons in the rat. Brain Research. 226(1-2). 43–60. 22 indexed citations
16.
Brink, Emily E., Kohnosuke Jinnai, Naoki Hirai, & Victor J. Wilson. (1981). Cervical input to vestibulocollic neurons. Brain Research. 217(1). 13–21. 16 indexed citations
17.
Brink, Emily E. & Donald W. Pfaff. (1980). Vertebral Muscles of the Back and Tail of the Albino Rat (<i>Rattus norvegicus albinu</i><i>s</i>); pp. 1–23. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 17(1). 1–23. 77 indexed citations
18.
Brink, Emily E., Doan T. Modianos, & Donald W. Pfaff. (1980). Ablations of Lumbar Epaxial Musculature: Effects on Lordosis Behavior of Female Rats. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 17(1). 67–88. 13 indexed citations
19.
Brink, Emily E. & Donald W. Pfaff. (1980). Vertebral Muscles of the Back and Tail of the Albino Rat (<i>Rattus norvegicus albinu</i><i>s</i>); pp. 24–47. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 17(1). 24–47. 4 indexed citations
20.
Brink, Emily E., Joan I. Morrell, & Donald W. Pfaff. (1979). Localization of lumbar epaxial motoneurons in the rat. Brain Research. 170(1). 23–41. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026