Emily E. Bray
Impact in
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Genetics top 5%
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Papers in ⓘ
- Co-authors
- Evan L. MacLean (16 shared papers)Brian Hare (5 shared papers)James A. Serpell (5 shared papers)Robert M. Seyfarth (3 shared papers)Dorothy L. Cheney (3 shared papers)Mary D. Sammel (3 shared papers)Brenda S. Kennedy (10 shared papers)Kerinne Levy (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Animal Cognition (4 papers)Frontiers in Veterinary Science (3 papers)Current Biology (2 papers)Animal Behaviour (2 papers)GeroScience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Bray
19 papers receiving 642 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Small Animals 240
- Genetics 520
- Pharmacy 88
- Developmental Biology 34
- Social Psychology 293
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Bray
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Bray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Bray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Bray. The network helps show where Emily E. Bray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 16 | Evidence for win-stay-lose-shift in puppies and adult dogs. | 2020 | 3 |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 18 | Ontogeny and Heritability of Cognitive and Behavioral Traits Linked to Success as a Military Working Dog | 2019 | 1 |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Emily E. Bray
Emily E. Bray is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Genetics, Small Animals, Social Psychology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (19 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Infant Health and Development (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (240 citations), Genetics (520 citations), Pharmacy (88 citations), Developmental Biology (34 citations) and Social Psychology (293 citations). Emily E. Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Evan L. MacLean, Brian Hare, James A. Serpell, Robert M. Seyfarth, Dorothy L. Cheney, Mary D. Sammel, Brenda S. Kennedy, Kerinne Levy, Angie M. Johnston and Monique A. R. Udell. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Cognition, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Current Biology, Animal Behaviour and GeroScience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.