Emily Cox

1000 total citations
32 papers, 707 citations indexed

About

Emily Cox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Cox has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 707 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Emily Cox's work include Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (18 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (12 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (6 papers). Emily Cox is often cited by papers focused on Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (18 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (12 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (6 papers). Emily Cox collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and United States. Emily Cox's co-authors include Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon, Neil R. Edwards, Rob Bellamy, Stuart Capstick, J. Steinberger, Gareth Thomas, Jan Selby, Miranda Boettcher and Sarah Royston and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Energy Policy and Nature Energy.

In The Last Decade

Emily Cox

30 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Cox United Kingdom	15	346	265	148	116	105	32	707
Sean Low Denmark	20	460 1.3×	568 2.1×	270 1.8×	126 1.1×	99 0.9×	46	982
Zoi Vrontisi Greece	15	101 0.3×	183 0.7×	487 3.3×	58 0.5×	307 2.9×	22	903
Wolfgang Obergassel Germany	11	76 0.2×	143 0.5×	220 1.5×	40 0.3×	89 0.8×	45	469
William Blyth United Kingdom	16	106 0.3×	174 0.7×	700 4.7×	51 0.4×	376 3.6×	30	1.2k
Michel Colombier France	8	54 0.2×	98 0.4×	205 1.4×	37 0.3×	186 1.8×	16	585
Hanna Brauers Germany	9	157 0.5×	159 0.6×	227 1.5×	63 0.5×	238 2.3×	17	739
Mathieu Blondeel United Kingdom	12	122 0.4×	108 0.4×	228 1.5×	34 0.3×	199 1.9×	20	673
Gabriel Bachner Austria	17	107 0.3×	141 0.5×	230 1.6×	42 0.4×	144 1.4×	29	619
Asbjørn Torvanger Norway	20	229 0.7×	428 1.6×	948 6.4×	167 1.4×	337 3.2×	77	1.5k
Ros Taplin Australia	16	170 0.5×	168 0.6×	132 0.9×	16 0.1×	82 0.8×	41	607

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cox

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cox

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cox. The network helps show where Emily Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Cox. Emily Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Cox, Emily, Sean Low, Chad M. Baum, et al.. (2025). Carbon removal beyond the trees. Communications Earth & Environment. 6(1). 253–253. 3 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2024). Questionable devices: Applying a large language model to deliberate carbon removal. Environmental Science & Policy. 162. 103940–103940.

Aziz, Azlina Abd, et al.. (2024). Public perception of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and its influencing factors: evidence from a survey in Malaysia. Sustainability Science. 20(2). 401–422. 3 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2024). Public attitudes and emotions toward novel carbon removal methods in alternative sociotechnical scenarios. Environmental Research Letters. 19(8). 84026–84026. 9 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, Richard P. Lim, Elspeth Spence, et al.. (2024). Question-Led Innovation: Public priorities for enhanced weathering research in Malaysia. Environmental Science & Policy. 163. 103977–103977. 4 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2024). Public engagement and collaboration for carbon dioxide removal: lessons from a project in the Dominican Republic. Frontiers in Climate. 6. 8 indexed citations

Müller-Hansen, Finn, et al.. (2024). Attention and positive sentiments towards carbon dioxide removal have grown on social media over the past decade. Communications Earth & Environment. 5(1).

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2023). Localized governance of carbon dioxide removal in small island developing states. Environmental Development. 49. 100942–100942. 6 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2023). Perception spillover from fracking onto public perceptions of novel energy technologies. Nature Energy. 8(2). 149–158. 33 indexed citations

10.

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2023). Carbon removal demonstrations and problems of public perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. 15(1). 15 indexed citations

11.

Barrett, John, et al.. (2023). Delivering net zero in the UK: twelve conditions for success. Environmental Research Letters. 18(7). 74041–74041. 9 indexed citations

12.

Cox, Emily, et al.. (2022). Localized governance of carbon dioxide removal in Small Island Developing States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

13.

Cox, Emily. (2022). “I hope they shouldn't happen”: Social vulnerability and resilience to urban energy disruptions in a digital society in Scotland. Energy Research & Social Science. 95. 102901–102901. 8 indexed citations

14.

Spence, Elspeth, Emily Cox, & Nick Pidgeon. (2021). Exploring cross-national public support for the use of enhanced weathering as a land-based carbon dioxide removal strategy. Climatic Change. 165(1-2). 23–23. 37 indexed citations

15.

Cox, Emily, Miranda Boettcher, Elspeth Spence, & Rob Bellamy. (2021). Casting a Wider Net on Ocean NETs. Frontiers in Climate. 3. 29 indexed citations

16.

Cox, Emily, Elspeth Spence, & Nick Pidgeon. (2019). Incumbency, Trust and the Monsanto Effect: Stakeholder Discourses on Greenhouse Gas Removal. Environmental Values. 29(2). 197–220. 21 indexed citations

17.

Cox, Emily, Nick Pidgeon, Elspeth Spence, & Gareth Thomas. (2018). Blurred Lines: The Ethics and Policy of Greenhouse Gas Removal at Scale. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 6. 42 indexed citations

18.

Cox, Emily. (2017). Assessing long-term energy security: The case of electricity in the United Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 82. 2287–2299. 34 indexed citations

19.

Cox, Emily. (2016). Opening the black box of energy security: A study of conceptions of electricity security in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science. 21. 1–11. 35 indexed citations

20.

Cox, Emily. (2015). Opening the Black Box of Energy Security: A Study of Conceptions of Electricity Security in the UK.. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact