Emily C. Beck

813 total citations
10 papers, 650 citations indexed

About

Emily C. Beck is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Rheumatology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily C. Beck has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 650 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Biomaterials, 6 papers in Rheumatology and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Emily C. Beck's work include Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers). Emily C. Beck is often cited by papers focused on Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers). Emily C. Beck collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emily C. Beck's co-authors include Michael S. Detamore, Stevin H. Gehrke, Cory Berkland, Marilyn Barragan, Jakob M. Townsend, Emi A. Kiyotake, Richard A. Hopkins, Gabriel L. Converse, Amanda Sutherland and Sarah L. Kieweg and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Progress in Polymer Science and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emily C. Beck

10 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Emily C. Beck

BE

BIOMA

SURGE

RHEUM

AE

Yu Seon Kim United States

Elvira Montañez‐Heredia Spain

Xiongfa Ji China

Bahar Bilgen United States

Cristina Antich Spain

A. J. Pedro Portugal

Paul René van Weeren Netherlands

Emma Watson United States

Jingzhou Yang China

Vivian H. M. Mouser Netherlands

Yu Seon Kim United States

Emily C. Beck

316 ×0.8

BE

235 ×0.8

BIOMA

209 ×0.8

SURGE

131 ×0.7

RHEUM

81 ×0.8

AE

Citations per year, relative to Emily C. Beck Emily C. Beck (= 1×) peers Yu Seon Kim

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Beck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Beck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Beck. The network helps show where Emily C. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Beck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Beck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Beck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Beck. Emily C. Beck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Uzarski, Joseph S., et al.. (2023). Sustained in vivo perfusion of a re-endothelialized tissue engineered kidney graft in a human-scale animal model. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 11. 1184408–1184408. 4 indexed citations

2.

Beck, Emily C., et al.. (2021). Assessment of electrospun cardiac patches made with sacrificial particles and polyurethane‐polycaprolactone blends. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 109(11). 2154–2163. 13 indexed citations

3.

Townsend, Jakob M., Emily C. Beck, Stevin H. Gehrke, Cory Berkland, & Michael S. Detamore. (2019). Flow behavior prior to crosslinking: The need for precursor rheology for placement of hydrogels in medical applications and for 3D bioprinting. Progress in Polymer Science. 91. 126–140. 172 indexed citations

4.

Beck, Emily C., Marilyn Barragan, Sarah L. Kieweg, et al.. (2016). Chondroinduction from Naturally Derived Cartilage Matrix: A Comparison Between Devitalized and Decellularized Cartilage Encapsulated in Hydrogel Pastes. Tissue Engineering Part A. 22(7-8). 665–679. 52 indexed citations

5.

Beck, Emily C., et al.. (2016). Approaching the compressive modulus of articular cartilage with a decellularized cartilage-based hydrogel. Acta Biomaterialia. 38. 94–105. 171 indexed citations

6.

Beck, Emily C., Marilyn Barragan, Emi A. Kiyotake, et al.. (2016). Chondroinductive Hydrogel Pastes Composed of Naturally Derived Devitalized Cartilage. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 44(6). 1863–1880. 32 indexed citations

7.

Kiyotake, Emi A., Emily C. Beck, & Michael S. Detamore. (2016). Cartilage extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for cartilage regeneration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1383(1). 139–159. 62 indexed citations

8.

Sutherland, Amanda, Emily C. Beck, Gabriel L. Converse, et al.. (2015). Decellularized Cartilage May Be a Chondroinductive Material for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. PLoS ONE. 10(5). e0121966–e0121966. 119 indexed citations

9.

Beck, Emily C., et al.. (2015). Enabling Surgical Placement of Hydrogels Through Achieving Paste-Like Rheological Behavior in Hydrogel Precursor Solutions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 43(10). 2569–2576. 22 indexed citations

10.

Beck, Emily C., Cory Berkland, Stevin H. Gehrke, & Michael S. Detamore. (2013). Novel Hyaluronic Acid Nanocomposite Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Utilizing Yield Stress for Ease of Implantation. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact