Emily Bowie

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Emily Bowie is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Bowie has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Emily Bowie's work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers) and Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (2 papers). Emily Bowie is often cited by papers focused on Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers) and Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (2 papers). Emily Bowie collaborates with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Emily Bowie's co-authors include Brigid L.M. Hogan, Christina E. Barkauskas, Craig R. Rackley, Douglas R. Keene, Barry R. Stripp, Scott H. Randell, Michael J. Cronce, Paul W. Noble, Sarah C. Goetz and Qiaohong Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Emily Bowie

6 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung

2013 1.2k citations Christina E. Barkauskas, Michael J. Cronce et al. Journal of Clinical Investigation profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Bowie United States	6	1.1k	596	527	117	84	6	1.6k
Mareike Lehmann Germany	19	879 0.8×	247 0.4×	480 0.9×	144 1.2×	61 0.7×	47	1.5k
Shao‐tao Tang China	21	379 0.3×	1.1k 1.8×	224 0.4×	123 1.1×	59 0.7×	106	1.5k
Guanchao Jiang China	18	382 0.3×	151 0.3×	508 1.0×	122 1.0×	96 1.1×	75	1.2k
Anne Hinds United States	15	356 0.3×	242 0.4×	374 0.7×	234 2.0×	30 0.4×	25	890
Eric B. Meltzer United States	9	685 0.6×	145 0.2×	285 0.5×	85 0.7×	34 0.4×	12	1.1k
Leonidas Manolopoulos Greece	18	289 0.3×	364 0.6×	300 0.6×	357 3.1×	65 0.8×	61	1.4k
Katherine Radford Canada	21	588 0.5×	299 0.5×	230 0.4×	95 0.8×	31 0.4×	61	1.4k
Makoto Sata Japan	21	415 0.4×	189 0.3×	412 0.8×	262 2.2×	39 0.5×	44	1.2k
Raffaella Santi Italy	18	359 0.3×	328 0.6×	201 0.4×	245 2.1×	56 0.7×	94	1.3k
Menachem Laufer Israel	17	522 0.5×	488 0.8×	268 0.5×	229 2.0×	56 0.7×	51	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Bowie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Bowie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Bowie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Bowie. The network helps show where Emily Bowie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Bowie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Bowie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Bowie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Bowie. Emily Bowie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Bowie, Emily & Sarah C. Goetz. (2020). TTBK2 and primary cilia are essential for the connectivity and survival of cerebellar Purkinje neurons. eLife. 9. 46 indexed citations

2.

Bowie, Emily, et al.. (2018). Spinocerebellar ataxia type 11-associated alleles of Ttbk2 dominantly interfere with ciliogenesis and cilium stability. PLoS Genetics. 14(12). e1007844–e1007844. 37 indexed citations

3.

Jain, Rajan, Christina E. Barkauskas, Norifumi Takeda, et al.. (2015). Plasticity of Hopx+ type I alveolar cells to regenerate type II cells in the lung. Nature Communications. 6(1). 6727–6727. 214 indexed citations

4.

Wansleeben, Carolien, et al.. (2014). Age-Related Changes in the Cellular Composition and Epithelial Organization of the Mouse Trachea. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e93496–e93496. 41 indexed citations

5.

Barkauskas, Christina E., Michael J. Cronce, Craig R. Rackley, et al.. (2013). Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 123(7). 3025–3036. 1207 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Sheehan, Dale, Tim Wilkinson, & Emily Bowie. (2012). Becoming a practitioner: Workplace learning during the junior doctor's first year. Medical Teacher. 34(11). 936–945. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact