Emil Tkadlec

2.4k total citations
59 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Emil Tkadlec is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emil Tkadlec has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Ecology, 18 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 12 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Emil Tkadlec's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (32 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). Emil Tkadlec is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (32 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). Emil Tkadlec collaborates with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and Norway. Emil Tkadlec's co-authors include Jan Zejda, Sven Krackow, Martin Šálek, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Marta Heroldová, Josef Bryja, Pavel Široký, Marek Bednář, Michaela Kubelová and Eva Jánová and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emil Tkadlec

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emil Tkadlec Czechia 22 1.2k 459 423 264 196 59 1.6k
Otso Huitu Finland 26 1.2k 1.0× 469 1.0× 527 1.2× 320 1.2× 122 0.6× 75 1.9k
Peter J. Pekins United States 19 854 0.7× 366 0.8× 241 0.6× 185 0.7× 227 1.2× 67 1.3k
Donald J. Brightsmith United States 28 1.2k 1.0× 461 1.0× 848 2.0× 235 0.9× 261 1.3× 85 2.1k
Erling L. Meisingset Norway 20 1.2k 1.0× 217 0.5× 302 0.7× 154 0.6× 146 0.7× 46 1.5k
Jean‐Louis Chapuis France 22 881 0.7× 472 1.0× 143 0.3× 379 1.4× 315 1.6× 57 1.5k
Rebecca A. Bartel United States 10 583 0.5× 330 0.7× 195 0.5× 218 0.8× 197 1.0× 12 1.2k
Nilton C. Cáceres Brazil 27 1.5k 1.2× 527 1.1× 459 1.1× 189 0.7× 98 0.5× 114 2.0k
Brian L. Cypher United States 22 1.3k 1.1× 293 0.6× 266 0.6× 416 1.6× 101 0.5× 102 1.7k
Alexandre Robert France 22 1.1k 0.9× 541 1.2× 511 1.2× 364 1.4× 179 0.9× 91 1.7k
Linas Balčiauskas Lithuania 19 951 0.8× 174 0.4× 135 0.3× 230 0.9× 215 1.1× 144 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Emil Tkadlec

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emil Tkadlec's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emil Tkadlec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emil Tkadlec more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emil Tkadlec

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emil Tkadlec. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emil Tkadlec. The network helps show where Emil Tkadlec may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emil Tkadlec

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emil Tkadlec. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emil Tkadlec based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emil Tkadlec. Emil Tkadlec is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tkadlec, Emil, Radek Aulický, Marek Bednář, et al.. (2025). Field size as a determinant of common vole population density. Pest Management Science. 82(3). 2740–2745.
2.
Tkadlec, Emil, et al.. (2024). Treatment options for impacted maxillary canines and occurrence of ankylotic and resorptive processes: a 20-year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 24(1). 877–877. 4 indexed citations
3.
Tkadlec, Emil, et al.. (2023). Comparison of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with five different adhesive systems: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 23(1). 637–637. 2 indexed citations
4.
Tkadlec, Emil, et al.. (2021). Spatial and numerical responses of Red Kites Milvus milvus to the Common Vole Microtus arvalis population outbreak in central Europe. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 67(5). 5 indexed citations
5.
Tkadlec, Emil, et al.. (2020). Cytoplasmic Transfer Improves Human Egg Fertilization and Embryo Quality: an Evaluation of Sibling Oocytes in Women with Low Oocyte Quality. Reproductive Sciences. 28(5). 1362–1369. 13 indexed citations
6.
Jacob, Jens, Christian Imholt, Constantino Caminero Saldaña, et al.. (2020). Europe-wide outbreaks of common voles in 2019. Journal of Pest Science. 93(2). 703–709. 50 indexed citations
7.
Jánová, Eva, et al.. (2015). Does reproduction accelerate the growth of eye lens mass in female voles?. 1 indexed citations
8.
Procházka, Martin, et al.. (2015). High incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproduction is related to genetic information, but not to assisted reproduction technology itself. Fertility and Sterility. 103(3). 756–760. 24 indexed citations
9.
Machar, Ivo, et al.. (2015). Barn Owl Productivity Response to Variability of Vole Populations. PLoS ONE. 10(12). e0145851–e0145851. 14 indexed citations
10.
Šálek, Martin, et al.. (2014). Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient. Mammal Review. 45(1). 1–14. 209 indexed citations
11.
Kubelová, Michaela, Emil Tkadlec, Marek Bednář, Eva Roubalová, & Pavel Široký. (2011). West-to-east differences of Babesia canis canis prevalence in Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in Slovakia. Veterinary Parasitology. 180(3-4). 191–196. 45 indexed citations
12.
Široký, Pavel, Michaela Kubelová, Marek Bednář, et al.. (2011). The distribution and spreading pattern of Dermacentor reticulatus over its threshold area in the Czech Republic—How much is range of this vector expanding?. Veterinary Parasitology. 183(1-2). 130–135. 60 indexed citations
13.
Šarapatka, B., Tomáš Kuras, Zdeněk Laštůvka, et al.. (2010). Agroekologie: východiska pro udržitelné zemědělské hospodaření. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 2 indexed citations
14.
Heroldová, Marta, M Pejčoch, Josef Bryja, et al.. (2010). Tula Virus in Populations of Small Terrestrial Mammals in a Rural Landscape. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 10(6). 599–603. 17 indexed citations
15.
Tkadlec, Emil, et al.. (2009). Is there a declining trend in ovarian function among infertility clinic patients?. Human Reproduction. 25(1). 127–132. 1 indexed citations
16.
Zejda, Jan, et al.. (2007). Measurement error in a burrow index to monitor relative population size in the common vole. Folia Zoologica. 56(2). 169–176. 21 indexed citations
17.
Jánová, Eva, et al.. (2003). Age variation in a fluctuating population of the common vole. Oecologia. 137(4). 527–532. 18 indexed citations
18.
Tkadlec, Emil. (1994). Response of voles to the concentration of crimidine in rodenticidal baits. Crop Protection. 13(6). 474–478. 1 indexed citations
19.
Tkadlec, Emil & Rolf Gattermann. (1993). Circadian changes in susceptibility of voles and golden hamsters to acute rodenticides. Journal of Interdisiplinary Cycle Research. 24(3). 153–161. 2 indexed citations
20.
Šimůnek, Jiřı́, et al.. (1985). Effects of Sulphadimidine on the Toxicity of Phenobarbital, Pentetrazole and Bemegride in Mice of Different Ages. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 54(3-4). 177–182. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026