Elyssa Payne

454 total citations
10 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

Elyssa Payne is a scholar working on Genetics, Small Animals and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elyssa Payne has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Small Animals and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Elyssa Payne's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). Elyssa Payne is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). Elyssa Payne collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Elyssa Payne's co-authors include Paul McGreevy, Pauleen C. Bennett, Melissa Starling, Andrew N. McLean, Paul Carter, S Odell, Margaret McGrath, Rachael Gray, Jaime Gongora and Damien P. Higgins and has published in prestigious journals such as The Veterinary Journal, Behavioural Processes and Animals.

In The Last Decade

Elyssa Payne

10 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Elyssa Payne Australia	7	293	120	98	52	52	10	331
Alessandra Alterisio Italy	12	338 1.2×	141 1.2×	150 1.5×	64 1.2×	45 0.9×	13	457
Ana Maria Barcelos United Kingdom	10	288 1.0×	123 1.0×	47 0.5×	37 0.7×	57 1.1×	13	329
Lauren Brubaker United States	10	276 0.9×	97 0.8×	110 1.1×	60 1.2×	40 0.8×	13	345
Iris Schöberl Austria	8	328 1.1×	115 1.0×	116 1.2×	112 2.2×	47 0.9×	13	342
Lauren Finka United Kingdom	13	337 1.2×	222 1.9×	75 0.8×	47 0.9×	43 0.8×	21	439
Niwako Ogata United States	14	378 1.3×	184 1.5×	103 1.1×	32 0.6×	39 0.8×	29	475
Natalia Albuquerque Brazil	9	322 1.1×	139 1.2×	146 1.5×	63 1.2×	36 0.7×	16	410
Serena Adamelli Italy	8	366 1.2×	169 1.4×	86 0.9×	61 1.2×	95 1.8×	13	394
Kevin McPeake United Kingdom	8	271 0.9×	161 1.3×	62 0.6×	27 0.5×	26 0.5×	15	311
Mia Cobb Australia	10	316 1.1×	181 1.5×	91 0.9×	23 0.4×	38 0.7×	21	387

Countries citing papers authored by Elyssa Payne

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elyssa Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elyssa Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elyssa Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elyssa Payne

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elyssa Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elyssa Payne. The network helps show where Elyssa Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elyssa Payne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elyssa Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elyssa Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elyssa Payne. Elyssa Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Starling, Melissa, Elyssa Payne, & Paul McGreevy. (2021). Optimal Flow—A Pilot Study Balancing Sheep Movement and Welfare in Abattoirs. Animals. 11(2). 344–344. 1 indexed citations

2.

McGreevy, Paul, Melissa Starling, Elyssa Payne, & Pauleen C. Bennett. (2017). Defining and measuring dogmanship: A new multidisciplinary science to improve understanding of human–dog interactions. The Veterinary Journal. 229. 1–5. 16 indexed citations

3.

Payne, Elyssa, Melissa Starling, & Paul McGreevy. (2017). Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Observational Studies in Sheep Abattoirs. Animals. 7(11). 82–82. 1 indexed citations

4.

Payne, Elyssa, Pauleen C. Bennett, & Paul McGreevy. (2016). DogTube: An examination of dogmanship online. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 17. 50–61. 10 indexed citations

5.

Payne, Elyssa, Pauleen C. Bennett, & Paul McGreevy. (2015). Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog–human dyad. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 8. 71–71. 184 indexed citations

6.

Payne, Elyssa, et al.. (2015). Evidence of horsemanship and dogmanship and their application in veterinary contexts. The Veterinary Journal. 204(3). 247–254. 27 indexed citations

7.

Payne, Elyssa, et al.. (2015). Exploring the existence and potential underpinnings of dog–human and horse–human attachment bonds. Behavioural Processes. 125. 114–121. 67 indexed citations

8.

Payne, Elyssa, et al.. (2015). Dogmanship on the farm: Analysis of personality dimensions and training styles of stock dog handlers in Australia. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 10(6). 471–478. 15 indexed citations

9.

Payne, Elyssa, et al.. (2014). Primers for amplifying major histocompatibility complex class II DQB and DRB exon 2 in the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Conservation Genetics Resources. 6(4). 813–816. 1 indexed citations

10.

Carter, Paul, et al.. (1986). Skill requirements for interactive video instruction of persons with mental retardation.. PubMed. 24(2). 99–105. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact