Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation
2011725 citationsKieron Flanagan, Elvira Uyarra et al.Research Policyprofile →
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions
This map shows the geographic impact of Elvira Uyarra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elvira Uyarra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elvira Uyarra more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elvira Uyarra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elvira Uyarra. The network helps show where Elvira Uyarra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elvira Uyarra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elvira Uyarra.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elvira Uyarra based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elvira Uyarra. Elvira Uyarra is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kogler, Dieter F., Emil Evenhuis, Elisa Giuliani, et al.. (2023). Re-imagining evolutionary economic geography. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 16(3). 373–390.33 indexed citations
Uyarra, Elvira, et al.. (2013). Competitive dialogue and contractual design fostering innovation and needs analysis Dialogue. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
13.
Caniëls, Marjolein C.J., et al.. (2010). Regional innovation Policy in Transition: Reflections on the Change Process in the Skåne Region. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
14.
Flanagan, Kieron, Elvira Uyarra, & Manuel Laranja. (2010). The 'policy mix' for innovation: rethinking innovation policy in a multi-level, multi-actor context. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).23 indexed citations
Tsipouri, Lena, Jakob Edler, Max Rolfstam, & Elvira Uyarra. (2009). Risk management in the procurement of innovation. Concepts and empirical evidence in the European Union. Report to the EU Commission. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
17.
Uyarra, Elvira & Kieron Flanagan. (2009). From regional innovation systems to regions as innovation policy spaces. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 150–169.2 indexed citations
18.
Uyarra, Elvira & Kieron Flanagan. (2009). Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
19.
Howells, Jeremy, Bruce Tether, & Elvira Uyarra. (2004). Innovation in Service: issue at stake and trends [Study for DG Enterprise, Commission of the European Communities]. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).13 indexed citations
20.
Uyarra, Elvira, et al.. (2002). Evaluation, foresight and participation as new elements for regional innovation policy practice: lessons from the regional innovation strategies (RIS). Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.