Ellen M. Kosik

404 total citations
9 papers, 277 citations indexed

About

Ellen M. Kosik is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Ellen M. Kosik has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 277 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Ellen M. Kosik's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (7 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers). Ellen M. Kosik is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (7 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers). Ellen M. Kosik collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Ellen M. Kosik's co-authors include Ian A. Walmsley, C. Dorrer, L. Corner, E. Cormier, Adam S. Wyatt, Louis F. DiMauro, Matthew E. Anderson and Luís E. E. de Araújo and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Optics Letters and Applied Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Ellen M. Kosik

8 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ellen M. Kosik United States	7	267	95	61	44	41	9	277
Filippo Campi Sweden	9	252 0.9×	105 1.1×	34 0.6×	52 1.2×	13 0.3×	15	269
M. Fieß Germany	6	338 1.3×	117 1.2×	74 1.2×	74 1.7×	12 0.3×	7	352
Hubert Eichmann Germany	7	437 1.6×	142 1.5×	65 1.1×	87 2.0×	11 0.3×	16	461
Sung In Hwang South Korea	7	260 1.0×	61 0.6×	103 1.7×	43 1.0×	25 0.6×	16	286
P. Ceccherini Italy	6	309 1.2×	131 1.4×	36 0.6×	74 1.7×	11 0.3×	12	323
Paolo Villoresi Italy	6	285 1.1×	97 1.0×	39 0.6×	61 1.4×	12 0.3×	12	303
G. Veitas Lithuania	6	286 1.1×	143 1.5×	125 2.0×	16 0.4×	15 0.4×	6	311
M. Louisy Sweden	5	285 1.1×	78 0.8×	41 0.7×	85 1.9×	11 0.3×	6	296
Péter Jójárt Hungary	9	294 1.1×	88 0.9×	169 2.8×	32 0.7×	6 0.1×	34	323
Armin Hoffmann Germany	6	351 1.3×	72 0.8×	202 3.3×	65 1.5×	7 0.2×	12	394

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen M. Kosik

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen M. Kosik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen M. Kosik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen M. Kosik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen M. Kosik

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen M. Kosik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen M. Kosik. The network helps show where Ellen M. Kosik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen M. Kosik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen M. Kosik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen M. Kosik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen M. Kosik. Ellen M. Kosik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Cormier, E., L. Corner, Ellen M. Kosik, Ian A. Walmsley, & Adam S. Wyatt. (2005). Spectral phase interferometry for complete reconstruction of attosecond pulses. Laser Physics. 15(6). 909–915. 6 indexed citations

2.

Cormier, E., Ian A. Walmsley, Ellen M. Kosik, et al.. (2005). Self-Referencing, Spectrally, or Spatially Encoded Spectral Interferometry for the Complete Characterization of Attosecond Electromagnetic Pulses. Physical Review Letters. 94(3). 33905–33905. 46 indexed citations

3.

Kosik, Ellen M., et al.. (2005). Interferometric technique for measuring broadband ultrashort pulses at the sampling limit. Optics Letters. 30(3). 326–326. 78 indexed citations

4.

Kosik, Ellen M., L. Corner, Adam S. Wyatt, et al.. (2005). Complete characterization of attosecond pulses. Journal of Modern Optics. 52(2-3). 361–378. 14 indexed citations

5.

Kosik, Ellen M., et al.. (2004). Spatially-encoded spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1. 1 indexed citations

6.

Dorrer, C., Ellen M. Kosik, & Ian A. Walmsley. (2002). Spatio-temporal characterization of the electric field of ultrashort optical pulses using two-dimensional shearing interferometry. Applied Physics B. 74(S1). s209–s217. 50 indexed citations

7.

Dorrer, C., Ellen M. Kosik, & Ian A. Walmsley. (2002). Direct space–time characterization of the electric fields of ultrashort optical pulses. Optics Letters. 27(7). 548–548. 45 indexed citations

8.

Dorrer, C., Ellen M. Kosik, & Ian A. Walmsley. (2001). Space-time characterization of ultrashort optical pulses using 2-dimensional shearing interferometry. 78–79.

9.

Anderson, Matthew E., Luís E. E. de Araújo, Ellen M. Kosik, & Ian A. Walmsley. (2000). The effects of noise on ultrashort-optical-pulse measurement using SPIDER. Applied Physics B. 70(S1). S85–S93. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact