Ellen Crawford

770 total citations
10 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

Ellen Crawford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ellen Crawford has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Biophysics. Recurrent topics in Ellen Crawford's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (3 papers). Ellen Crawford is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (3 papers). Ellen Crawford collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Serbia. Ellen Crawford's co-authors include Michael J. Hendzel, John P.H. Th'ng, Gustavo Carrero, Gerda de Vries, Darin McDonald, Eric Carpenter, Jack A. Tuszyński, J.M. Dixon, M. V. Satarić and Janice A. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Ellen Crawford

10 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ellen Crawford Canada 8 445 118 116 71 48 10 611
Asmahan Abu‐Arish Canada 13 401 0.9× 70 0.6× 82 0.7× 72 1.0× 33 0.7× 22 649
Gustavo Carrero Canada 8 450 1.0× 124 1.1× 144 1.2× 28 0.4× 24 0.5× 15 559
Lindsay Haarbosch Netherlands 4 535 1.2× 191 1.6× 149 1.3× 61 0.9× 90 1.9× 4 793
Julian A. Eskin United States 10 506 1.1× 113 1.0× 418 3.6× 49 0.7× 53 1.1× 11 798
Arnon Henn Israel 16 664 1.5× 52 0.4× 213 1.8× 87 1.2× 61 1.3× 31 954
Veronica Pessino United States 9 417 0.9× 140 1.2× 101 0.9× 32 0.5× 23 0.5× 10 617
Dirk Landgraf United States 12 627 1.4× 120 1.0× 70 0.6× 42 0.6× 205 4.3× 14 798
Jean‐René Alattia Canada 13 504 1.1× 80 0.7× 138 1.2× 16 0.2× 34 0.7× 18 694
P. Walther Germany 9 305 0.7× 39 0.3× 87 0.8× 31 0.4× 27 0.6× 12 571
Elisa Dultz Switzerland 15 885 2.0× 71 0.6× 278 2.4× 34 0.5× 79 1.6× 18 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Crawford. The network helps show where Ellen Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Crawford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Crawford. Ellen Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Crawford, Ellen, et al.. (2022). Assessing a Video-Based Intervention to Promote Parent Communication Strategies with a Deaf Infant: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(18). 5272–5272. 2 indexed citations
2.
Tuszyński, Jack A., Janice A. Brown, Ellen Crawford, et al.. (2005). Molecular dynamics simulations of tubulin structure and calculations of electrostatic properties of microtubules. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 41(10). 1055–1070. 96 indexed citations
3.
Shiao, Yih‐Horng, et al.. (2004). Allele-specific germ cell epimutation in the spacer promoter of the gene after Cr(III) exposure. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 205(3). 290–296. 35 indexed citations
4.
Hendzel, Michael J., et al.. (2004). The C-terminal Domain Is the Primary Determinant of Histone H1 Binding to Chromatin in Vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(19). 20028–20034. 190 indexed citations
5.
Carrero, Gustavo, et al.. (2004). Characterizing fluorescence recovery curves for nuclear proteins undergoing binding events. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 66(6). 1515–1545. 45 indexed citations
7.
Tuszyński, Jack A., Tyler Luchko, Eric Carpenter, & Ellen Crawford. (2004). Results of Molecular Dynamics Computations of the Structural and Electrostatic Properties of Tubulin and Their Consequences for Microtubules. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 1(4). 392–397. 20 indexed citations
8.
Carrero, Gustavo, Darin McDonald, Ellen Crawford, Gerda de Vries, & Michael J. Hendzel. (2003). Using FRAP and mathematical modeling to determine the in vivo kinetics of nuclear proteins. Methods. 29(1). 14–28. 163 indexed citations
9.
Carrero, Gustavo, Ellen Crawford, John P.H. Th'ng, Gerda de Vries, & Michael J. Hendzel. (2003). Quantification of Protein–Protein and Protein–DNA Interactions In Vivo, Using Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 375. 415–442. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026