Elizabeth Rees

783 total citations
21 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Rees is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Rees has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Rees's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Elizabeth Rees is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Elizabeth Rees collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Elizabeth Rees's co-authors include Janet Hardy, Julie Ling, Karen Broadley, Roger A’Hern, Patrick Stone, David Feuer, Rachel Burman, Bridget Gwilliam, C. H. S. Ruxton and David C. Seaberg and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Annals of Emergency Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Rees

20 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth Rees United Kingdom 14 294 184 152 117 81 21 592
Flavio Fusco Italy 14 259 0.9× 178 1.0× 161 1.1× 75 0.6× 148 1.8× 24 615
Karen S. Ogle United States 13 518 1.8× 156 0.8× 188 1.2× 272 2.3× 30 0.4× 27 871
Olaitan Soyannwo Nigeria 12 262 0.9× 151 0.8× 67 0.4× 64 0.5× 135 1.7× 42 610
Alberto Alonso‐Babarro Spain 9 311 1.1× 105 0.6× 78 0.5× 84 0.7× 52 0.6× 30 414
Inger Schou Bredal Norway 12 95 0.3× 97 0.5× 152 1.0× 69 0.6× 73 0.9× 19 494
James Hallenbeck United States 17 491 1.7× 151 0.8× 59 0.4× 232 2.0× 59 0.7× 38 702
Bernd Alt‐Epping Germany 18 773 2.6× 320 1.7× 218 1.4× 307 2.6× 51 0.6× 109 1.0k
Katsuya Kanda Japan 14 121 0.4× 111 0.6× 164 1.1× 191 1.6× 10 0.1× 38 647
Wadih Rhondali France 19 777 2.6× 406 2.2× 449 3.0× 271 2.3× 110 1.4× 56 1.2k
Debbie Selby Canada 17 444 1.5× 160 0.9× 277 1.8× 124 1.1× 112 1.4× 47 849

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Rees. The network helps show where Elizabeth Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Rees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Rees. Elizabeth Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Black, Emily, et al.. (2024). A new drought model for disaster risk management in the Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan provinces of Pakistan. Frontiers in Climate. 6. 2 indexed citations
2.
Black, Emily, Clare Harris, Mary Kilavi, et al.. (2022). Towards drought impact-based forecasting in a multi-hazard context. Climate Risk Management. 35. 100402–100402. 22 indexed citations
3.
Kite, Suzanne, et al.. (2020). Findings from the first round of the National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL). Future Healthcare Journal. 7(Suppl 1). s36–s36. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rees, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). 165 Improving care of patients with terminal agitation (ta) at end of life at leeds teaching hospitals nhs trust. Poster presentations. A70.1–A70. 1 indexed citations
5.
6.
Rees, Elizabeth, et al.. (2008). A 'pain-free' death. British Medical Bulletin. 88(1). 23–41. 4 indexed citations
7.
Papa, Linda, et al.. (2008). Does a waiting room video about what to expect during an emergency department visit improve patient satisfaction?. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 10(4). 347–354. 39 indexed citations
8.
Trakulsrichai, Satariya, et al.. (2007). The Impact of an Accelerated Clinical Protocol with Outpatient Stress Testing in Chest Pain Patients at Low Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome on Admission Rates. Academic Emergency Medicine. 14(5 Supplement 1). S165–S165. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lavin, J., Amanda Avery, Stephen Whitehead, et al.. (2006). Feasibility and benefits of implementing a Slimming on Referral service in primary care using a commercial weight management partner. Public Health. 120(9). 872–881. 45 indexed citations
10.
Papa, Linda, et al.. (2005). Does Preparing Patients for Their Emergency Department Experience Through a Waiting Room Video About Process of Care Improve Their Satisfaction?. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 46(3). 23–24. 1 indexed citations
11.
Rees, Elizabeth, et al.. (2003). Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent. BMJ. 327(7408). 198–198. 40 indexed citations
12.
Rees, Elizabeth, et al.. (2002). Is there a dose response relationship for clodronate in the treatment of tumour induced hypercalcaemia?. British Journal of Cancer. 86(8). 1235–1237. 8 indexed citations
13.
Rees, Elizabeth. (2002). The role of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the management of breakthrough cancer pain. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 8(6). 304–308. 15 indexed citations
14.
Rees, Elizabeth, et al.. (2002). An assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a ‘double dose’ of normal-release morphine sulphate at bedtime. Palliative Medicine. 16(6). 507–512. 15 indexed citations
15.
Hardy, Janet, Elizabeth Rees, Julie Ling, et al.. (2001). A prospective survey of the use of dexamethasone on a palliative care unit. Palliative Medicine. 15(1). 3–8. 86 indexed citations
16.
Hardy, Janet, Elizabeth Rees, Bridget Gwilliam, et al.. (2001). A Phase II Study to Establish the Efficacy and Toxicity of Sodium Valproate in Patients With Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 21(3). 204–209. 32 indexed citations
17.
Stone, Patrick, Elizabeth Rees, & Jean-François Hardy. (2001). End of life care in patients with malignant disease. European Journal of Cancer. 37(9). 1070–1075. 13 indexed citations
18.
Rees, Elizabeth. (2001). The ethics and practicalities of consent in palliative care research: an overview. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 7(10). 489–492. 21 indexed citations
19.
Ling, Julie, Elizabeth Rees, & Janet Hardy. (2000). What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre?. European Journal of Cancer. 36(5). 621–626. 112 indexed citations
20.
Hardy, Janet, et al.. (1999). The Use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in Palliative Care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 18(2). 79–84. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026